General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama's puzzling silence on marijuana policy [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)I quoted an editorial that said one way Obama could get the youth vote fired up to campaign is to indicate he wants to look at the issue of cannabis.
If you read my post, you would see that, within the second week of his presidency, FDR signed the "Beer Bill," which signaled his commitment to ending prohibition. It was important enough to his administration to call for an end of prohibition in his second week in office. You are trying to rewrite history - that's in the link you provided.
If FDR got the nomination because he moved from "dry" to "wet" - AS YOUR LINK INDICATED- that absolutely means ending prohibition was central to his gaining the nomination, no matter how much you want to rewrite history in an hysterical defense of something that was never even said by me in the first place.
And, here is where you really prove how lowlife you can be when you claim I love my marijuana myths more than fact.
There is no myth in any of this. None at all. You are lying because you don't like it that Obama is willing to continue a repulsive, wasteful, racist and idiotic policy and you care more about how this LOOKS than the impact it has upon people around this nation.
There are many states that have draconian marijuana laws. The entire nation is not CA. NYC and Chicago, as reports have demonstrated, use marijuana laws to target minorities.
This is not a myth. This is reality.
I have no use for you anymore. You just demonstrated to me you are nothing but a hack.