At the risk of annoying many DUers I have to say

[OLDMADAM]

190. Thank you, you made my case better than I could have..

Just think that any delicately chosen words that I proffer, given my low count posts, that a poster is required to be safe from ridicule or worse, could escape unscathed, is to deny reality.. To you, and too many on this Democratic forum, being a skeptic in face of the contradictory evidence, or lack of fact is to be, as you say, "It strikes me more like never faithful. I prefer to be uncautious when presuming the innocence of people especially people of color who have been murdered by the police.", the WOW factor is off the scale..

"How many facts do you need?".. well, as many knowledgeable voices as are available, to judge which are credible, and those which are offered to fit a preconceived agenda, as true as the agenda may be supported by their own facts.. I can't conceive how it could be justified, to shoot an unarmed teen, to death, there may be more behind the scenes to add substance to that travesty.. Until I hear more, and since it doesn't cost anything to wait a short time, I'll err of the side of caution, and pray the radicals don't taint the future..