Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Gotta pay for the new war somehow! Signed, pissed off! [View all]Jeff Rosenzweig
(121 posts)37. How come you seem to have missed it?
SNAP will use an estimated $45.2 billion of Recovery Act funds to increase benefits to serve the growing number of families seeking assistance... Starting in April 2009, most four-person households began receiving an $80 increase in their monthly SNAP allotment to spend on groceries. These ARRA-funded benefit increases will end on October 31, 2013.
The Recovery Act also provided nearly $300 million to States for SNAP administrative expenses in FY 2009 and 2010.
The ARRA investments in SNAP have been implemented as planned with benefit increases going out on April 1, 2009 and continuing each month, and administrative dollars being spent by SNAP State agencies to address the significant caseload increases.
The Recovery Act also provided nearly $300 million to States for SNAP administrative expenses in FY 2009 and 2010.
The ARRA investments in SNAP have been implemented as planned with benefit increases going out on April 1, 2009 and continuing each month, and administrative dollars being spent by SNAP State agencies to address the significant caseload increases.
http://www.fns.usda.gov/arra/supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, if we can only get Democrats in charge of the Senate! Or maybe the White House!
Scuba
Aug 2014
#65
You're correct that spending bills originate in the House, but they must also be passed ...
Scuba
Aug 2014
#68
Absolutely. And thus, you fail to grasp the essential economic blackmail that is being done by the
msanthrope
Aug 2014
#73
Rich, Republican farmers, many of whom are in Congress. The President should have vetoed ...
Scuba
Aug 2014
#74
Other than blaming the President on a partisan board..what are you doing? nt
msanthrope
Aug 2014
#42
I agree, and let's not forget there are about 16 members of Congress (or their spouses)
Samantha
Aug 2014
#52
I am thinking the same thing. I already miss meals yet it would appear eating
Dragonfli
Aug 2014
#30
Since I have to deal with her greedy mother at work, who is giving me a hard time,
magical thyme
Aug 2014
#87
Terrible. "The food stamp cuts are one component of a massive omnibus bill ..."
pampango
Aug 2014
#14
Apparently it is being defended with some nonsense about how some people don't need to eat because
Dragonfli
Aug 2014
#33
Oh, wonderful. What states was that supposed to effect again? Or was that the last cut that hit some
jwirr
Aug 2014
#22