General Discussion

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)

46. Exactly.

Reply to Drunken Irishman (Reply #37)

Sun Aug 24, 2014, 04:43 PM

Aug 2014

I was saying this back then.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary is Inevitable!!1! [View all] Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 OP

So point me at the Barack Obama of 2016. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #1

I wanted to disagree with that, but the longer he waited, the more he would have shown his DLC yurbud Aug 2014 #6

And he damned near didn't do it. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #8

a lot of historic stuff is decided by decisions that small. Henry Wallace was delayed making it to yurbud Aug 2014 #35

Eliz. Warren + one of the Castro Bros. Voice for Peace Aug 2014 #40

Julin Castro is already being groomed by Hillary and Warren isn't running. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #50

and who do YOU have that beats every potential Republican in head to head competition? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #2

AND will govern as much like a Republican as possible? yurbud Aug 2014 #4

still no candidate huh? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #9

Maybe that candidate is like the one that doesn't show on the charts above. JaydenD Aug 2014 #24

Maybe you have no candidate with polls that show that THEY like Hillary can beat ALL VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #25

someone can't be your boogeyman at election time and role model for policy the rest of the time yurbud Aug 2014 #33

Its not about boogey men...WHO do you have that can beat ALL Republicans... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #36

I'm sensing some sarcasm yurbud Aug 2014 #61

what you are sensing is called Reality..... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #63

I'm calling that the Kardashian factor - lots of air time and recognition, little substance. JaydenD Aug 2014 #38

Oh ye of little faith... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #60

Little substance you say....hmmmmm VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #62

Best response ever! CrispyQ Aug 2014 #31

so do you CrispyQ have a Democrat in mind that has proven they can take all Republican comers? VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #59

Don't have one. There isn't a candidate that can beat the big money candidates. CrispyQ Aug 2014 #87

Hmmmm... Does my candidate have to also be republican-lite? nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #10

Your candidate has to win the Primary AND be able to beat every Republican VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #12

So, you want us to defeat the republican nominee with our own republican? nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #16

I want to beat the Republicans with someone with a D after their name... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2014 #26

There's a difference between a D and a DINO. So, you want a DINO to have ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #43

The only DINOs in the world are the people who call our best Democratic Politicians "DINOs". MohRokTah Aug 2014 #51

Fuck that noise. I don't need you johnny-coming-in-here-lately telling me to ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #52

You apparently have no clue what a Democrat is. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #54

And a serious lack of adult vocabulary. libdem4life Aug 2014 #56

Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Fuck. Fuck Hillary! nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #58

<----------------That's the way to GreenParyUnderground.com eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #64

I'm not going anywhere. :) nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #66

You sound like you don't like Democrats, just tryin' to help. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #68

I'm not going anywhere. I'm going to work my ass off to nominate someone other than Hillary. nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #70

Ya know, good luck with that. That's the Democratic way and I support you in that. eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #71

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service zappaman Aug 2014 #75

#6 ... I've stated many times that I will vote if Hillary is the nominee, in this thread also. ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #76

Wow, two whole years! zappaman Aug 2014 #79

Nope. I did alert. Just because I don't support Hillary and choose to support another Democrat ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #80

Wow. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #84

Awwww, you mad, bro? Looks like you're mad... Here you go: ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #57

Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, PAtrick Leahy, ... MohRokTah Aug 2014 #65

You can continue your usual nonsense if you like. I've put myself on record more than once ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #69

GOOD YOUR YOU! eom MohRokTah Aug 2014 #72

Yep, with as much gusto as I did to elect Obama and Big Dog. nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #73

That's the amount of gusto I'm putting into Hillary. MohRokTah Aug 2014 #81

I also did your first two points, including the prediction. I was also at President Obama's first ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #83

Yet you still referred to her as a "DINO". MohRokTah Aug 2014 #85

OMG!! Do you even realize what you wrote? Dawgs Aug 2014 #44

Not when that D is for Doofus. JaydenD Aug 2014 #45

like Westmoreland's "Destroy the village to save it." yurbud Aug 2014 #30

But if Hillary can't beat a Democratic opponent... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Aug 2014 #39

Warren MoleyRusselsWart Aug 2014 #47

Who cares? jeff47 Aug 2014 #55

This. nt ChisolmTrailDem Aug 2014 #74

fits my theory that Hillary is the witting or unwitting decoy until Democrats can settle on real yurbud Aug 2014 #3

What do we want? A competitive primary! When do we want it? 2016! Dems to Win Aug 2014 #5

Yeah I hope there's a progressive competitor for 2016. Hillary's to the right of Obama. Louisiana1976 Aug 2014 #28

personality, gender, and otherwise, I have no problem with Hillary, but on policy... yurbud Aug 2014 #32

The Kennedy endorsement gave Obama the Presidency leftstreet Aug 2014 #7

It wasn't pivotal to me. Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 #11

Hillary appears inevitable because TPTB will not allow any Democratic nominee who is not pretty far indepat Aug 2014 #13

Who is being stifled? OilemFirchen Aug 2014 #17

Me thinks the hopes of a Wesley Clark or an Elizabeth Warren would be quashed as if a indepat Aug 2014 #18

So your declaration was simply a prediction, yes? OilemFirchen Aug 2014 #21

Well, take Howard Dean in '04 for an example. Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 #20

I believe the Iowa Caucus did him in. OilemFirchen Aug 2014 #22

The Scream was a hatchet job, pure and simple RufusTFirefly Aug 2014 #49

TPTB at work effectively quashing the unwashed indepat Aug 2014 #53

It's a LIE. woo me with science Aug 2014 #14

PLUS ONE, a whole bunch! Enthusiast Aug 2014 #86

Not in my book Faux pas Aug 2014 #15

All weekend long sadoldgirl Aug 2014 #19

Keeping my eyes on 2014 emulatorloo Aug 2014 #67

Well....she inevitably supports wars and Republican policies. Tierra_y_Libertad Aug 2014 #23

Whomever OFA backs with their unmatched ground game is inevitable. conservaphobe Aug 2014 #27

Clinton/Dean 2016 thelordofhell Aug 2014 #29

you got it half right. yurbud Aug 2014 #34

This poll proves Hillary was not inevitable. Drunken Irishman Aug 2014 #37

Good point. DCBob Aug 2014 #42

Exactly. joshcryer Aug 2014 #46

yep! and is why I rec'd the thread. n/t Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2014 #91

Lizzie is no Obama. DCBob Aug 2014 #41

Presidential polls at this juncture are almost entirely about name recognition RufusTFirefly Aug 2014 #48

+1, and lol at "Joe-mentum" reference emulatorloo Aug 2014 #78

Then my not casting a vote in the 2016 Presidential election too is inevitable. Purveyor Aug 2014 #77

Hillary got 48% of the actual vote, an improvement from this poll mathematic Aug 2014 #82

YAwn ...another appeal to those who would take comfort in being aligned with a majority poll... L0oniX Aug 2014 #88

Are you quite sure you understood my point here? Jackpine Radical Aug 2014 #89

Clinton is inevitable. Orsino Aug 2014 #90

whether you like her, or not the 'inevitability' is because we have reached a point JCMach1 Aug 2014 #92