Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary ignores questions about Ferguson and walks out of store. [View all]magical thyme
(14,881 posts)9. well what's a candidate to do?
Stand with the 1% or with the rest of us?
Certainly the wife of our "first black president" knows where she stands? Doesn't she?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And that is not what is needed right now, we need LEADERSHIP. This country needs
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#138
I completely agree with you. She gives the middle finger to left-wing minded people often.
stillwaiting
Aug 2014
#35
she is worse than just a coward. she is a hypocrite. 3am phone call anyone?
roguevalley
Aug 2014
#53
Like when she had to duck from sniper fire? Oh wait, she "misspoke" about that.
Divernan
Aug 2014
#69
Someone who wants to be President shouldn't be afraid to speak their views on any subject.
ohnoyoudidnt
Aug 2014
#77
I strongly agree. She is very smart and knows that if she comments on Ferguson she will reveal
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#89
She is the Powers That Be heir apparent for the Presidency. Speaking out would only
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#97
You provided no argument to dispel the idea that H. Clinton-Sachs represents the Aristocracy.
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#91
Now, now. She can't afford to offend those fickle "moderates" and the Reagan Democrats
Chakab
Aug 2014
#8
Like I said previously, the diversion would harm the movement in favor of the GOP.
FarPoint
Aug 2014
#27
You don't understand. If a Democratic politician keeps her powder dry for the perfect moment,
Chakab
Aug 2014
#33
Yeah, because you know who really knows politics. The person who managed to lose in spite of having
Chakab
Aug 2014
#40
oh god. she has nothing . even dead children won't make her have couage of conviction, rednecks be
roguevalley
Aug 2014
#58
bull. you need to consider if she felt anything she woul speak. diversion is a cop out. even rand
roguevalley
Aug 2014
#56
You "SENSE" her heartfelt pain...WTF? Is that the same as looking into her eyes and seeing her
Ecumenist
Aug 2014
#131
You support her choice at this time? I can't go that far, I just support choice
A Simple Game
Aug 2014
#70
We need to wait until all the evidence is in. You know, just like with alleged "climate change."
RufusTFirefly
Aug 2014
#64
Not at a book signing, she wouldn't. You realize that there are no conversations at book signings
KittyWampus
Aug 2014
#112
Most of the MRAPS and Helicopters and Night Vision/Rocket Launchers are under Obama
KoKo
Aug 2014
#126
The ONLY way you get into the store during a book signing is to buy the book and have it signed
KittyWampus
Aug 2014
#114
It sounds quite correct that 700 people standing in line to get a book signed
Dragonfli
Aug 2014
#121
Obviously she believes she can win the presidency without African American voters
tularetom
Aug 2014
#36
Right on! She must think white women alone will get her elected. But little does she know there
Louisiana1976
Aug 2014
#41
We haven't forgotten the way that she tried to play working class whites and Latinos against
Chakab
Aug 2014
#42
I believe it is much simpler, I am sure she honestly believes that minorities and other liberals
Dragonfli
Aug 2014
#125
They aren't going to vote for a Repug...so she has them...and the rest of us Dems..
KoKo
Aug 2014
#127
OMG! I forgot about her vote for cluster bombs - how could ANY parent vote for that?
Divernan
Aug 2014
#101
Lots of gramma's hearts were atwitter watching their grandchildren blown up in wars
JaydenD
Aug 2014
#110
Currently Hillary does not hold a public office. For all who jump on the bash hillary wagon,
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#55
Well, the OP article that you posted is asinine. It was a book signing. NOBODY asks questions.
KittyWampus
Aug 2014
#115
The problem is she was happy to criticize Obama's FP and take sides with Israel
BeyondGeography
Aug 2014
#79
She has been advised not to make statements per Donna Bazille, she cant change
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#88
Except when we're told she's inevitable (again) and the primaries are just a formality.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#140
She does not currently hold a public office, it is time for those in public office to speak up.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#90
And Bill was no populist (in practice, at least.) So the bar's set pretty damned low. n/t
X_Digger
Aug 2014
#104
After all these decades, if she can't assemble a competent team, imagine presidential appointments.
Divernan
Aug 2014
#82
Well, there go her chances of being the first black female president of the U.S.
Baitball Blogger
Aug 2014
#80
The War And Wall Street Candidate Falls Flat On Civil Rights And Police Brutality
cantbeserious
Aug 2014
#87
She isn't now nor never has been a candidate for the people. She represents Wall Street. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#94
Such overt racism from both Clintons is disgusting to say the least, yet some people here still gleefully support em, amazing <SMH>
InAbLuEsTaTe
Aug 2014
#142
Nothing honest about a Wall Street corporatist; we need to look elsewhere.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Aug 2014
#137
WTF> IT WAS A BOOK SIGNING. You do not get to ask questions at a book signing.
KittyWampus
Aug 2014
#111
But yet she expects the Black vote and in same percentages as Obama.........
trublu992
Aug 2014
#130