Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
Tue Aug 26, 2014, 10:04 PM Aug 2014

Should people who are able to work, have to work? [View all]

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need

My knowledge of Marx is cursory at best but the above statement heralded by Marx but not attributed to him appears to be popular among many self identified Marxist. I wanted to know more about what Marx thought about the idea and found the following. My problem with the idea has always been that people should not have to work if they do not want to, it's that simple, for me. So I am struggling to understand why we would ever support such a system, at least the portion of "each according to his ability". As Marx himself appeared to understand that this would be applicable at some point in time in which work isn't the four letter word it is now to many. That being physical drudgery. I don't know about you but I do not see a time in the near future when work will not be physical, demanding, demeaning, repetitive and joyless as it can be to so many.

Personally I find the idea dangerous to progressivism, am I just understanding it wrong?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_ability,_to_each_according_to_his_need#Debates_on_the_idea

Marx delineated the specific conditions under which such a creed would be applicable—a society where technology and social organization had substantially eliminated the need for physical labor in the production of things, where "labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want".[11] Marx explained his belief that, in such a society, each person would be motivated to work for the good of society despite the absence of a social mechanism compelling them to work, because work would have become a pleasurable and creative activity. Marx intended the initial part of his slogan, "from each according to his ability" to suggest not merely that each person should work as hard as they can, but that each person should best develop their particular talents
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Impossible under current circumstances NYC_SKP Aug 2014 #1
Yes, let's start with Romney and W. broiles Aug 2014 #2
If ample work is provided and workers are provided a living wage, yes. conservaphobe Aug 2014 #3
... woo me with science Aug 2014 #4
Damn, thank you! Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #5
R. Buckminster Fuller is correct. hunter Aug 2014 #10
+1 nt laundry_queen Aug 2014 #14
^^^Ding, ding, ding! Correct answer.^^^ TexasTowelie Aug 2014 #27
+1 leftstreet Aug 2014 #17
We already have that. It's called capitalism BainsBane Aug 2014 #22
"One in ten thousand...supporting all the rest." MindPilot Aug 2014 #29
We have a system already where a small portion of the population doesn't work, primarily because of CAG Aug 2014 #6
Provide the jobs, and a lot more people will happily work. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #7
Then wouldn't the entire system unravel? Matrosov Aug 2014 #8
There are thousands of people early retireing (in 30's-40's) due to the ACA and 401k kelly1mm Aug 2014 #9
That's interesting Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #15
I think you are doing society a FAVOR by retiring early, thereby giving some younger CTyankee Aug 2014 #39
No. ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #11
Most people should be paid a living wage. liberalmuse Aug 2014 #12
U.S. policy is 'Greed is good' CobaltBlue Aug 2014 #13
I think the word "ability" Shankapotomus Aug 2014 #16
That was one of the issues I have with the idea Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #28
Well, there is one factor that could limit Shankapotomus Aug 2014 #38
Bureaucracy and Social Ignorance Gets in the Way of the Ideal daredtowork Aug 2014 #18
Given that productivity has improved by a factor of 4 since the end of WW II, no eridani Aug 2014 #19
Why wouldn't you work, and who would support you? BainsBane Aug 2014 #20
... Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #23
Thanks. Sheldon Cooper Aug 2014 #34
Thank you for saying that. hamsterjill Aug 2014 #45
Thank you for spelling all that out for the OP. Starry Messenger Aug 2014 #40
+1 n/t Matrosov Aug 2014 #43
All the robotized manufacturing,... hmm Trillo Aug 2014 #21
I dunno. Do you have something that needs to be done that you're willing to pay for? Recursion Aug 2014 #24
how can people who work for peanuts feel good about work? AZ Progressive Aug 2014 #25
I have never seen work as a bad word. merrily Aug 2014 #26
Define work. hobbit709 Aug 2014 #30
For those of us lucky enough to have jobs, MindPilot Aug 2014 #31
You mean able bodied rich people who have trust funds? Quantess Aug 2014 #32
I agree - most people are pretty useless and contribute nothing el_bryanto Aug 2014 #33
I work hard at managing my family fortune. B Calm Aug 2014 #35
Should some people be able to live off the fruits of other people's work? To quote VanGoghRocks Aug 2014 #36
Hell no. AngryAmish Aug 2014 #37
They should do something Algernon Moncrieff Aug 2014 #41
We should all contribute to society in some manner. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2014 #42
The "utopian" vision of Howard Zinn (from People's History) yallerdawg Aug 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should people who are abl...