Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Wed Aug 27, 2014, 08:52 AM Aug 2014

The NSA Search Engine is a Keyhole to You [View all]

And it's largely owned and operated by the corporate cronies of War Inc, the BFEE.



Obese Intelligence

The NSA Search Engine

by BINOY KAMPMARK
CounterPunch, Aug. 27, 2014

The Intercept was already getting the intelligence community excited with its revelations that the National Security Agency had decided to mimic inspector Google. Through creating a search engine in the manner of those pro-transparency pioneers, the intelligence community was turning the tables on the very idea of searchable information. Why keep it the operating preserve of the public? The search engine has, as it stands, over 850 billion records about phone calls, emails, cellphone locations, and internet chats.

The revelations have a few implications, the most obvious one confirming the seamless transition between intelligence work on the one hand, and the policing function on the other. The distinction between intelligence communities whose interests are targeting matters foreign to the polity; and those who maintain order within the boundaries of a state in a protective capacity, prove meaningless in this form. The use of ICREACH makes it clear that the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation are regular clients and users of the system.

A 2010 memorandum from the Chief of Liaison Support Group at the CIA titled “CIA colleagues enthusiastically welcome NSA training” speaks with praise about those “NSA-ers embedded in CIA’s workspaces”. Indeed, it speaks very highly of the “information sharing” ethos of the NSA within the Intelligence Community, channelling Google’s operating rationale within more secret spaces. Furthermore, in 2010, the relevant data base provided the NSA “and second Party telephony metadata events to over 1000 analysts across 23 US Intelligence Community agencies.”

Those keen on squirreling information into such a data base are no doubt thrilled by the prospects that it can be made available to the “appropriate” sources. ICREACH has become one of the largest, if not largest system for the internal processing and sharing of surveillance records within the United States. It is not, according to The Intercept, connected with the NSA database that stores data on Americans’ phone calls pursuant to s. 215 of the Patriot Act.

The difference between the two accumulated pools of data is one of scope: ICREACH is mammoth in reach, and positively defiant in its push against the law; the database gathered under s. 215 guidelines is minute in comparison, confined to the dangerously pertinent idea of combating terrorism and like threats. ICREACH exists outside the system of court orders, being a creature of Executive Order 12333. The document, instituted by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, was intended to add robustness to the intelligence gathering capabilities of the US intelligence community.

CONTINUED...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/08/27/the-nsa-search-engine/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Those "in the know" have something the rest of us -- the "Little People" -- don't have access to: Inside Information. Judging by the historical record and the revolving door between the secret government and private industry, it doesn't get shared in a way that's best for democracy. No wonder the rich get richer and the rest of the country becomes poorer. And the wars for personal profit and concentrated secret power continue without end.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I figure interested parties has had the capability to know anything they want for many decades. gordianot Aug 2014 #1
True. The NAZIs the CIA brought in to fight the Commies were owned by the Commies. Octafish Aug 2014 #2
Important to add what Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) said in 1975 re NSA Surveillance Octafish Aug 2014 #3
I tend to view human behavior in a biological behavioral context. gordianot Aug 2014 #7
The idiot who replaced Church was an embarrassment to the state of Idaho IDemo Aug 2014 #19
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Aug 2014 #4
How VP Poppy of CIA got so big when Pruneface was Head Honcho Octafish Aug 2014 #8
Holy shit, I have never seen that photo before. If looks could kill... AtheistCrusader Aug 2014 #13
Here's one that has me wondering: Bill Clinton, George Bush & George Wallace Octafish Aug 2014 #14
K&R. nt OnyxCollie Aug 2014 #5
The NSA shares what they find. Octafish Aug 2014 #11
Is this K & R being recorded? L0oniX Aug 2014 #6
Down to the penny. Octafish Aug 2014 #15
K & R !!! WillyT Aug 2014 #9
I.B.M. rings a bell that tolls. Octafish Aug 2014 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author questionseverything Aug 2014 #10
Well, I hope they like porn. AtheistCrusader Aug 2014 #12
If anybody should know... Octafish Aug 2014 #17
John Negroponte was one beneficiary of the ability to GOOGLE your "Chat Handle" Octafish Aug 2014 #18
EO 12333 Octafish Aug 2014 #20
K&R woo me with science Aug 2014 #21
''When the president does it, it's not illegal.'' -- Richard Milhous Nixon, Crook Octafish Aug 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The NSA Search Engine is ...