Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Letting Kids Shoot Guns Is Good for Them--TIME magazine, Aug. 28, 2014 [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)56. Laughable. Utterly laughable.
"I know from experience gun violence could happen to anyone at any time."
Uh huh.
"We live with a physical fear of gun violence that restricts us as a society."
Most people don't.
"For example, I wouldn't go to a Walmart because of the Concealed and Open Carry crazies that like to do their ritual parades there."
So essentially, you're held hostage by your fear of these people and the guns they're carrying, in spite of the fact that this group of people which you point the finger at, are the least likely to commit "gun violence". And then you extrapolate from this "fear" and presume everyone else shares in it.
That makes sense.
The only one limiting your freedom, "holding you hostage", is you.
"Then there is the psychological impact. There is a pathology about a nation awash in guns. It is a symptom of deep insecurities."
Asserted without evidence, and dismissed likewise.
"And the need for owning and shooting unregulated military-style weapons is enough to give any responsible citizen serious concern."
Nice variation of "no true Scotsman" there. And "unregulated"? Ridiculous. "Military style"? So what. Heres your chance:
Please explain for the readers, what makes the "style" of the gun (as opposed to the substance) problematic.
("unregulated"
"These are weapons of mass destruction, weapons of war."
No, and no. They fire a single round of ammunition for a single pull of the trigger. They do NOT fire burst or fully automatic like true "weapons of war" do. Militaries generally do not limit their troops to semi-automatic weapons. What you're doing here, is repeating a falsehood which has been around for 20 years, OR you're deliberately attributing to these weapons falsely, characteristics which they do not have.
Or both.
You tell me.
I think you just don't like guns or at least "guns other people have", and will cling to whatever justification you can to support that. Like most of the anti-gun crowd. You have all the standard anti-gun talking points down - "military style", "weapons of mass destruction", "weapons of war", "unregulated", etc.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Letting Kids Shoot Guns Is Good for Them--TIME magazine, Aug. 28, 2014 [View all]
marions ghost
Aug 2014
OP
I've never "played" paintball but know of ranges. I have, however, played laser tag.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2014
#8
Actually, I don't get why people like to blow things up, beat up gays, torture animals...
NYC_SKP
Aug 2014
#85
We who choose to own firearms have a responsibility to our fellow citizens to be better custodians
Rex
Aug 2014
#28
I've never even held an AR-15, I don't get the attraction except that our culture glorifies war.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2014
#39
Please tell me they faced a lot of jail time for doing that or at least something punitive.
Rex
Aug 2014
#40
The judge is probably flabbergasted that two grown men would be so shallow and stupid.
Rex
Aug 2014
#43
Reader's Digest: I am Joe's Uzi-perforated heart, lungs, liver, and spleen
pinboy3niner
Aug 2014
#33