Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An internet truth regarding sexist/misogynist comments [View all]Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)225. she said she Lives For Hostility ...
if that tells you anything.
Lives.for.it.
and her ideals of governing sound distinctly Libertarian leaning ... to me. YMMV
I just still can not get past the living for hostility thing.
what a thing to live for.
sad.
really.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
298 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is where the argument fails for our free speech crowd, I can say anything
boston bean
Aug 2014
#9
I'm almost positive that if you put someone on ignore you don't serve on a jury for them. nt
boston bean
Aug 2014
#63
many people have the same ignore list, and skinner and others promote an ignore list. pool
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#126
No, that is not the case. Ignoring persons make it so you can't serve on a jury for them.
boston bean
Aug 2014
#155
yes, but putting them on ignore doesn't prevent them from serving on a jury on a post of yours.
boston bean
Aug 2014
#165
right. I was confused as admitted above and made a confusing situation even more confusing..
boston bean
Aug 2014
#167
that one is what puts me in a fit of giggles i see so often. in discussing a womans issue, i am
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#17
i am not walking either. the bigger point? i do not accept redq's walk either. or bigtree.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#73
Excuse me, I'd like to interrupt for just a second to say, as a cowardly weakling,
betsuni
Aug 2014
#202
right... we are talking about hateful bigoted speech on the privately owned internet sites.
boston bean
Aug 2014
#140
you live for hostility also? you do not believe we should stand up for our weak? now, you say
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#232
Look, I'm not sure why you're giving me so much grief, but you're welcome to your opinion as well.
MADem
Aug 2014
#270
Look, I don't see how I can make this much simpler for you--I even CUT AND PASTED the entire
MADem
Sep 2014
#287
There's no "shut up" in what I cut and pasted. Why would you say that there was?
MADem
Sep 2014
#290
speaking out is having someone protect you? some of us see it the opposite. nt
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#56
me either. for a lifetime. why? many reasons. utmost... how damn privileged i am.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#97
this is what gets me. a couple men applauding and saying they agree with EVERYTHING being said, is
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#233
I disagree, the problem has a solution. Make misogynists and sexists unwelcome
boston bean
Aug 2014
#62
Great post, boston bean! Free speech means A has the right to be bigoted, and B has the right to
DesertDiamond
Aug 2014
#33
then get a hide or you are incorrect. get five hides. get kicked off the board. be silenced.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#44
A is an idiot if A thinks that the First Amendment protects speech without limits.
Gormy Cuss
Aug 2014
#108
I've asked Skinner several times too. The answer, when he deigns to give one, is a resounding no.
Gormy Cuss
Aug 2014
#114
Also, gender discrimination is different than discrimination based on sex.
boston bean
Aug 2014
#250
I'm not understanding what the difference between bigotry based on gender and sexism is, though...
Violet_Crumble
Sep 2014
#276
I'm kind of suspecting that there's no real difference, kind of like anti-semitism and Jew-hatred...
Violet_Crumble
Sep 2014
#296
The problem with a terse list is that it doesn't represent a teaching moment.
Gormy Cuss
Sep 2014
#298
Islamophobia, yes...then add intersex discrimination (because gender isn't enough), then add
MADem
Sep 2014
#294
OMG. If you think the DU2 rules were convoluted, try adding the I/P forum guidelines on top of that!
Violet_Crumble
Sep 2014
#297
It's not special protection. It's strengthening the existing TOS language n/t
Gormy Cuss
Aug 2014
#246
No, it doesn't fall on deaf ears, and if you think that, you need to visit the archives.
MADem
Aug 2014
#53
WHAT? This is the exact opposite of "not making waves." I guess you didn't quite grasp the point
MADem
Aug 2014
#45
Perfect example--you're accusing me of sexism with that post. That's uncivil, AND confrontational.
MADem
Aug 2014
#253
you want to claim we sit on a balanced scale. so, to keep the balance, include msandry. the scales
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#101
We sit on a Democratic website that advocates a balanced scale in the party platform, so
MADem
Aug 2014
#191
um. how many male congress people? how many women? how many men in cabinet? how many women?
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#195
If you want to talk about the demographics of Congress, you can start a thread and send me a link.
MADem
Aug 2014
#197
you are the one to bring up hte fact it is democratic, women are covered and the scales balanced.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#198
i didnt see this post. you say, the democratic platform balances the scale for women.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#207
I'm done speaking with you. I'm not going to put up with your rudeness and your false
MADem
Aug 2014
#208
i am not being rude. i disagree with you. you are the one taking to personal and insults.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#212
you throw out a guess more women on jury than men with no facts to back you up.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#199
that just is not how it works. you do not get to make something up and say, prove otherwise.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#203
Neither do you. That didn't stop you from the accusation you made that I cut/pasted upthread. nt
MADem
Aug 2014
#205
No, that is not an equal situation. That would be like adding "whites rights" or something.
cui bono
Sep 2014
#279
Should we also replace all instance of "black" with "white" in regards to racism and add that?
JTFrog
Aug 2014
#133
Look--I can't stand all that back-and-forth gun bullshit. It sets my teeth on edge.
MADem
Aug 2014
#184
just accuse and imply, refuse to answer. well. i will answer. not a woman is "afraid", or whatever
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#173
"do not make this a scary, horrible place to post." sounds like you are suggesting women think this
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#178
now. i am clueless what you are saying or implying. polly. enjoy your new house.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#182
i do not know that there is a single person i hate. you started a thread and was on latest.
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#185
Apparently, hate doesn't include making someone very ill over spreading around personal info
polly7
Aug 2014
#258
Thanks, the funny thing is, she just demanded the apology for 'making her do those things'
polly7
Aug 2014
#274
I don't take things personally! I like to argue issues and ideas, and, as I've said
MADem
Aug 2014
#187
I think it all started after my very nice reply and you told me I was talking AT people.
boston bean
Aug 2014
#262
You can even block jerks from following you on twitter now, which is a good thing.
MADem
Aug 2014
#218
Conversations like this go nowhere because no one ever defines anything.
lumberjack_jeff
Aug 2014
#79
was that dismissive. all are mra, all are sexist? is that really what someone said? really?
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#105
The issue is any opinion that a feminist here doesn't like is automatically considered misogynistic
davidn3600
Aug 2014
#147
In real life, law enforcement does not take sexual assault seriously.
Manifestor_of_Light
Aug 2014
#226
wrong. people stay quiet, it feeds and grows. that is absolutely the incorrect choice, imo. nt
seabeyond
Aug 2014
#243