General Discussion

SidDithers

(44,333 posts)

11. It's more likely to be attacked by poorly trained rebels, with sophisticated Russian weapons...

Reply to another_liberal (Original post)

Sun Aug 31, 2014, 12:37 PM

Aug 2014

Like MH17 was.

Sid

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Europe's largest nuclear power plant is in danger of being hit by artillery fire. [View all] another_liberal Aug 2014 OP

At least it's not a solar plant or wind farm. If they were hit, it'd be... valerief Aug 2014 #1

Well, actually it is the safest and cleanest way of producing power. Unicorn_Actual Aug 2014 #4

Modern nuclear plants can withstand earthquakes and tidal waves, too. Octafish Aug 2014 #5

Actually they can. Unicorn_Actual Aug 2014 #6

Really? That must explain why TEPCO ignored the experts and built it anyway. Octafish Aug 2014 #8

That is what I just said. Unicorn_Actual Aug 2014 #10

No. You said nuclear ''is the the safest and cleanest way of producing power.'' Octafish Aug 2014 #17

You need to go back and re-read the post order. Unicorn_Actual Aug 2014 #19

Sorry about any confusion. Simplified: You side with TEPCO and nuclear power. I don't. Octafish Aug 2014 #21

I do side with nuclear power (because I understand it and haven't bought into propaganda). Unicorn_Actual Aug 2014 #22

So you don't side with TEPCO? Thanks for straightening me out. Octafish Aug 2014 #25

So what happened at Fukushima? malaise Aug 2014 #33

The weirdest thing. Octafish Aug 2014 #34

I love your posts Octafish malaise Aug 2014 #35

And I yours, malaise! Octafish Aug 2014 #38

I read it and like you was so upset malaise Aug 2014 #39

Absolutely amazing. n/t Aerows Aug 2014 #56

Octafish rocks Aerows Aug 2014 #42

So do you malaise Aug 2014 #51

I stand beneath tall shade. Aerows Aug 2014 #52

Well next to Octafish malaise Aug 2014 #53

I just grow here Aerows Aug 2014 #55

It wasn't built properly. NuclearDem Aug 2014 #45

Nuclear is safer than solar or wind? Uh, toxic waste. You've earned an Ignore from me. nt valerief Aug 2014 #7

OMG, I just about choked on my coffee! Trillo Aug 2014 #9

Yes, it really is the safest way of producing electricity. Unicorn_Actual Aug 2014 #23

A rudimentary search indicates your "300 deaths" for all nuclear industry is fiction. Trillo Aug 2014 #31

Yep Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #27

How is it safer and cleaner than solar? MH1 Aug 2014 #36

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2014 #40

I guess compared to people Aerows Aug 2014 #43

The responsible thing then would be for the Russian imperialists to lay down their arms and cease Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #2

That's one point of view . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #3

How long have you held this might-makes-right ethos? Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #30

It's more likely to be attacked by poorly trained rebels, with sophisticated Russian weapons... SidDithers Aug 2014 #11

You think they would intentionally irradiate their own homes? another_liberal Aug 2014 #13

No, I don't think Ukrainian forces would irradiate their own homes...nt SidDithers Aug 2014 #14

It's in Zaporizhia Oblast, not one of the ones rebelling muriel_volestrangler Aug 2014 #18

Not accurate Boreal Aug 2014 #41

Thanks for the link . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #50

This is alarmist stuff. Nobody is attacking the nuclear power plant. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2014 #12

It's what RT does...nt SidDithers Aug 2014 #15

Isn't that great! another_liberal Aug 2014 #16

Well, it's never too late to learn something new WhaTHellsgoingonhere Aug 2014 #20

Russian media via Greenpeace? Am I the only one who remembers Russia capturing Greenpeace members LeftyMom Aug 2014 #24

It was a press release by Greenpeace . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #26

As has been covered in this thread, every last detail of your narrative is wrong. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #28

Nope, no press release on their website. None on their twitter press feed either. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #29

The man who gave the interview to the German newspaper quoted . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #47

I checked the newspaper's website. I didn't find it there either. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #48

Look at reply #37 on this string . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #49

Deutsche Welle is reporting that the other paper reported it. Where's the original reporting? LeftyMom Aug 2014 #58

Perhaps that web site hasn't been updated . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #59

RT and Deutsche Welle both cited Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung. It's not on their website. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #60

I don't work for you, my friend . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #61

Your non-credible source is citing an interview that does not appear to exist. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #62

Your opinion . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #63

If you want to convince anybody you should go find it. I looked, it doesn't appear to exist. nt LeftyMom Aug 2014 #64

Not on a web site yet, perhaps . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #65

A credible source would get the benefit of the doubt. RT is full of it until proven otherwise. nt LeftyMom Aug 2014 #66

Seriously, friend, do get back to me. But for tonight . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #67

Oh my, a Ukraine and nuclear thread all at once? NuclearDem Aug 2014 #32

If only someone could bring Olive Garden Aerows Aug 2014 #44

Deutsche Welle is reporting this also bananas Aug 2014 #37

Thanks for noting that . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #46

Don't piss into the Wind PeoViejo Aug 2014 #54

Nuclear fallout on that scale . . . another_liberal Aug 2014 #57