Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(5,217 posts)

5. They have no moral imperative to reconcile their various attitudes to be consistent.

Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:28 AM

Sep 2014

They advance whatever talking point they hear or think they agree with, and feel no obligation to admit when two ideals they advance cannot co-exist.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You Don't Know What 'Libertarian' Means [View all] xchrom Sep 2014 OP

Perhaps it's the word "Libertarian." chervilant Sep 2014 #1

I think some of them pronounce it "Republican" shenmue Sep 2014 #2

After GWB they're all too embarrassed... Atman Sep 2014 #4

DING! DING! DING! We have a winner!!! Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #6

They don't even want to admit they voted for him twice. JoePhilly Sep 2014 #12

I have little patience for this "libertarian" bullshit Cosmocat Sep 2014 #7

Real Libertarians... CSStrowbridge Sep 2014 #8

Your last sentence is correct! /nt Sweet Freedom Sep 2014 #11

Most people don't know what "Liberal" means, either. OnyxCollie Sep 2014 #9

14% identified as libertarian; 11% got the definition right, and 3% got it wrong muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #13