Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you click on Jennifer Lawrence's naked pictures, you're perpetuating her abuse [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)110. So you admit your robbery analogy was full of shit?
And that you're just blaming a woman for the actions of some pathetic pervert low-life?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you click on Jennifer Lawrence's naked pictures, you're perpetuating her abuse [View all]
alp227
Sep 2014
OP
So do we take control of every site in the world or is this just a US thing?
krawhitham
Sep 2014
#21
Some blamed it on a bruteforce exploit in the find my iphone feature, but you still need the email
jakeXT
Sep 2014
#64
Yeah, we want INTERNET WORLD POLICE, who will remove any content that people find offensive!!!
MADem
Sep 2014
#97
I would be interested in what Jennifer Lawrence has to say about it...
TreasonousBastard
Sep 2014
#134
Of course it does... as we all illustrate our character in one way or another.
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#158
You support arresting someone who "views" photos? Sharing them I understand, but there.....
Logical
Sep 2014
#127
I suspect that would involve arresting a large portion of the planet.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#145
Obviously that's quite impractical. I can understand civil or criminal penalties for uploading
nomorenomore08
Sep 2014
#10
No way to enforce it anyhow, realistically. And I'm not all that interested in Ms. Lawrence's nudes
nomorenomore08
Sep 2014
#169
Your post is an example of the kind of misogyny we've been talking about lately.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#81
Putting the pictures on her phone was like putting them on her computer. That isn't the same
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#70
that's just as inane as saying if you have nice things in your home, you deserve to have them stolen
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2014
#163
I'll explain, and again this isnt judging. I think many people dont totally understand
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#113
Yes, but assuming you have a router and a firewall and some decent malware protection
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#133
The hacker victimized her by breaking into her data and dumping it into the open internet.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#90
I wouldn't use that analogy myself, but she's still the victim of a crime.
nomorenomore08
Sep 2014
#152
If an only if "free publicity" was the implicit goal. I imagine many prophets will allege it was...
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#159
Not drawing attention to them might have been a better tactic to avoid drawing attention to them.
CentralMass
Sep 2014
#54
Whoever is responsible for this hack is going to spend some time in the Graybar Hotel.
Baitball Blogger
Sep 2014
#55
Don't get it ... Poor celebrity strips and takes pictures. Good Lord. Kind of like if you don't
libdem4life
Sep 2014
#83
Get real. It's no crime, sheesh. Just obsessed with their bodies, get paid for same
libdem4life
Sep 2014
#109
Well, it was the first thing that came to mind. Others on here have better analogies, I'll
libdem4life
Sep 2014
#112
Photos like this are often leaked intentionally, this does not appear to be the case at all here.
tritsofme
Sep 2014
#111
Not arguing that. Just questioning all these nude selfies. First nipples, and a slippery slope
libdem4life
Sep 2014
#114
I disagree, anyone nude in public is free to photograph. And legal to post. You sound like the...
Logical
Sep 2014
#129
Does the OP give the impression they'd blame someone for something out of their control?
kcr
Sep 2014
#116
People are saying that those who accidently see it even if they didn't mean to are to blame?
kcr
Sep 2014
#118
Made me remember the photo developing shop employees passing around personal pictures...
L0oniX
Sep 2014
#107
Another reason to be thankful you're not a young, beautiful, rich, famous, starlet.
Kablooie
Sep 2014
#104
The more articles people write and post about it, the more people who didn't know anything of it before
NYC Liberal
Sep 2014
#124
best way to get someone to look at something, is to tell them not to look at it.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#140