General Discussion

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)

57. He sent them unsolicited to random women. If he'd sent them to his wife, no one would care.

Reply to leftstreet (Reply #18)

Mon Sep 1, 2014, 09:40 PM

Sep 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The hacker into Scarlet Johansson's online account was sentenced to 10 years in prison. [View all] pnwmom Sep 2014 OP

Did the Anthony Weiner photo-leaker go to jail? leftstreet Sep 2014 #1

didn't weiner send them the pic ? JI7 Sep 2014 #4

LOL I don't know. Can't help but notice the hypocrisy tho leftstreet Sep 2014 #5

huge difference. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #7

Hard to say what you noticed, but it wasn't hypocrisy kcr Sep 2014 #10

That wasn't my point at all leftstreet Sep 2014 #18

Because get this? It isn't the same thing. kcr Sep 2014 #19

Um, Weiner was tweeting it to random people... JaneyVee Sep 2014 #31

And didn't Wiener tweet it to a minor? n/t sweetloukillbot Sep 2014 #55

He sent them unsolicited to random women. If he'd sent them to his wife, no one would care. nomorenomore08 Sep 2014 #57

It isn't hypocritical because the situations are completely different. pnwmom Sep 2014 #11

there is no hypocrisy and its an important JI7 Sep 2014 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author gollygee Sep 2014 #44

That wasn't done by a hacker, was it? pnwmom Sep 2014 #8

He always claimed it was, but who knows leftstreet Sep 2014 #13

no. he initially claimed that them admitted he lied. that's why he resigned, ffs PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #14

Yes, because there's just no way to know about that stuff is there? kcr Sep 2014 #15

It's completely different. cui bono Sep 2014 #32

A better analogy is Brett Favre AngryAmish Sep 2014 #24

Ah yes leftstreet Sep 2014 #30

Key fact is "he sent". He was not hacked and his pic was not stolen. n/t cui bono Sep 2014 #33

Weiner was not hacked either AngryAmish Sep 2014 #36

Yes, Weiner was not hacked either. cui bono Sep 2014 #38

little background on Favre gawker dick pics AngryAmish Sep 2014 #43

Disagree. Lawrence had the pics stored on a drive/server which got hacked. cui bono Sep 2014 #46

How do you know that? AngryAmish Sep 2014 #49

That's the story. Hacker released nude pics of celebrities. cui bono Sep 2014 #53

I am pointing out the gender imbalance and the gendered tropes AngryAmish Sep 2014 #56

But you are missing the mark. Two COMPLETELY different scenarios. cui bono Sep 2014 #58

I think I see where we are talking past each other AngryAmish Sep 2014 #59

That is my understanding of it. That someone hacked into icloud and grabbed the pics cui bono Sep 2014 #62

He sent the picture. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #42

evidence? AngryAmish Sep 2014 #50

Well, if it comes out Gwyneth got her hands on her ex-hubby's phone.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2014 #60

What "people" here have been saying? itsrobert Sep 2014 #2

Lots of people. The worst of the comments, pnwmom Sep 2014 #9

Lol, my post didn't get hidden... alp227 Sep 2014 #48

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that. I changed my post to make clear that the nasty ones pnwmom Sep 2014 #51

It is possible to condemn the crime while still encouraging common sense re: the cloud. Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #3

And raising awareness of the possible prison sentence might deter some idiotic hackers. pnwmom Sep 2014 #17

I'd agree with that, too. Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #21

No one saw "Sex Tape" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2014 #61

Sentencing a hacker is good, should have gotten more time. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #6

He stole extremely valuable property AngryAmish Sep 2014 #25

Once a thief, always a thief. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #29

My first thought went further. kentauros Sep 2014 #45

I agree, like a pedophile, you sure would not give them a job in schools. Thinkingabout Sep 2014 #47

One can condemn both the hacker and the judgement behind putting nudes on the internet LittleBlue Sep 2014 #16

She didn't deliberately put the photos on the internet. pnwmom Sep 2014 #20

That's my point. Many people use their phone as their primary camera. Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #22

Honestly, I *am* tech savvy and this nonsense took me off guard RedCappedBandit Sep 2014 #26

I think for years, apple has gone for making things seamlessly convenient for users Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #27

I agree. It shouldn't be the default. n/t pnwmom Sep 2014 #37

Apple users on twitter say it's an option on the phone LittleBlue Sep 2014 #23

I dont know if everyone understands that, actually. Warren DeMontague Sep 2014 #28

No, even in 2014, not everyone understands the risk. Trumad made an OP about how pnwmom Sep 2014 #35

There's also a difference between putting something "on the internet" and cui bono Sep 2014 #34

Can't argue with that sentencing. AverageJoe90 Sep 2014 #39

Free money! XemaSab Sep 2014 #40

Nobody who is not a celebrity cwydro Sep 2014 #41

Sounds appropriate to me. aikoaiko Sep 2014 #52

People *should* know better. AND the hacker deserves jail time. Marr Sep 2014 #54