Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
4. First off, it's not murder one because murder one requires premeditation.
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 01:35 PM
Apr 2012

A guy planning out how to murder his business partner is murder one. Chasing somebody down who you've never met before, it's basically impossible to prove that there is pre-planned intent to kill them.

Second, the charges will likely be either manslaughter or murder two depending on what the prosecutor thinks they can nail. Murder two is certainly possible, but there's no telling whether the prosecutor will pass up the slightly higher charge in favor of the one that's basically a lock to prove. A 100% chance of conviction for manslaughter may outweigh an 80% chance of a conviction for murder two, particularly if your point is to prove that the justice system works--the last thing you want is for the guy to go loose because you charged higher than you could prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"A guy with a gun pu...»Reply #4