Hillary Clinton is Just Plain Wrong on GMOs

[MrMickeysMom]

171. I don't think there is a preponderance of peer reviewed scientific studies, much due to the industry

Uh… is that an answer for you?

This is no hyperbole… but, it's more than a cautionary note that GMO in the food chain has a direct relationship with poor health outcomes.

Your response seems, "so… show me peer review science, or your talk is nonsense"… It is not.

I see this the same way I see what has happened here in PA with a similar argument with the gas and oil industry. Because the state general assemblies pas laws (ALEC sourced) like Act 13, which forces infiltration of ground water and toxic air (causing poor health outcomes) and allows this industry to not have to release proprietary agents that go into hydraulic fracturing, the GMO companies' refusal to release information are tolerated here, not even requiring labeling of their products.

This is a safety issue, and I have no scientific peer reviewed journals that I can cut and paste without membership to the blue journals. I doubt this is the first time you've heard this. It is a great frustration voiced by others like me, so you may call my concern, "hyperbole", but I call it a safety issue to to the genetic alteration of the food chain.

Do you also want to gag unhappy consumers or those who demand labeling due to health concerns so that they can at least make informed decisions? Until the needed information is released to the public, we need to join other countries in doing this.

The problem is one of the GMO companies' making; they have only to release full details of what the added sequences make to let the public (or public interest groups) find out what dangers may lurk in those sequences (if any).

But you want the science first, or I should just be quiet? Dkembi says, "no-no-no-no! Get that weak shit outta here!"