Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Supporting precedent..... msanthrope Sep 2014 #1
How come the monkey takes a better pic than Bradley Cooper? FSogol Sep 2014 #2
Because the monkey has more functioning brain than the average Hollywood actor. nt msanthrope Sep 2014 #3
The monkey didn't have to work with several actors to make the picture. Dr. Strange Sep 2014 #9
Does this mean that photos uploaded to FB still belong to (are owned by) the person who took them? Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #4
I think when you join Facebook you cede copyright of uploaded photos to Facebook. Kablooie Sep 2014 #12
Yes, the person that took them still has copyright mathematic Sep 2014 #15
Thank you. Good to know. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #16
Websites should have to have signed release forms frazzled Sep 2014 #5
Upton is the niece of a Congressman, I wonder if that will influence things jakeXT Sep 2014 #7
The Constitution doesn't have an explicit protection of privacy. Kablooie Sep 2014 #13
It isn't a constitutional privacy issue - Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #17
So someone who wants to post a picture of their cat on DU Nye Bevan Sep 2014 #10
Releases aren't required for cats. Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #18
TMZ is just utterly worthless mythology Sep 2014 #6
What does TMZ have to do with it? LisaL Sep 2014 #8
What if the camera is owned by someone other than the photographer? Kablooie Sep 2014 #11
If you are involved with the setup there could be something, but not everything jakeXT Sep 2014 #14
Does she really believe she can get these pictures complely wiped from the internet? davidn3600 Sep 2014 #19
The issue isn't really whether she has a right to have them taken down (she does) Ms. Toad Sep 2014 #20
My sympathies are with the actress fadedrose Sep 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jennifer Lawrence -- Non-...»Reply #9