General Discussion

FLPanhandle

(7,107 posts)

40. I wouldn't recognize her and don't care what pictures she takes privately.

Wed Sep 3, 2014, 03:33 PM

Sep 2014

I only think she is naive for storing them online and/or trusting that anything online is safe.

Tough and public lesson for her to learn.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why J-Law's �Dirty� Photos Shouldn�t � & Probably Won�t � Make You Think Differently About Her [View all] big_dog Sep 2014 OP

Perhaps "shouldn't" should be directed to Ms. Lawrence. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Sep 2014 #2

That's pretty sick and not the least bit funny. newcriminal Sep 2014 #11

If that post is suggesting what I think it is NuclearDem Sep 2014 #13

yeah. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #15

You looked at images you knew were stolen from women who had no intent to share them? LeftyMom Sep 2014 #16

the whole world is talking about what is on there, good grief. big_dog Sep 2014 #20

Then why are you giggling like a teenager about them? People have sex. It's none of your business. LeftyMom Sep 2014 #23

Well, if you look at the posting history. It reads like a one man TMZ operation. So I Guy Whitey Corngood Sep 2014 #26

What "shouldn't" she do? PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #3

its all about pr damage control now, the current generation is a lot more 'forgiving' of J-Law big_dog Sep 2014 #5

The poster to whom I responded is saying she shouldn't take pics like that. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Sep 2014 #9

Thanks. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #10

we need to loosen up as a nation big_dog Sep 2014 #18

Nobody's shaming her. We're shaming people who stole her private property. LeftyMom Sep 2014 #19

just because someone doesn't want to share things with everyone doesn't mean they are ashamed JI7 Sep 2014 #21

nothing is infallible, its just not realistic to think that one can upload these things to the cloud big_dog Sep 2014 #25

what does that have to do with whether someone feels ashamed just because they don't JI7 Sep 2014 #27

no shame in her game, just dont post it to the cloud big_dog Sep 2014 #41

The ONLY 'shame' is that they were illegally obtained. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #22

Not for the computer, that's correct. Didn't say a darn thing about photos on film. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #33

they were not "for the computer". PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #36

Look, let's all stop pretending, in 2014, that we think computers are hack-free. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #32

You know what's stupid? Carrying money in your wallet. You really need to leave money in the bank PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #39

They tried it on her jakeXT Sep 2014 #14

That isn't the point imo, her right to privacy was violated and that is wrong. Rex Sep 2014 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Sep 2014 #12

Apple is a corporation. It claimed to offer security; it failed. There are no "rights" involved. WinkyDink Sep 2014 #37

Of course it won't... Sen. Walter Sobchak Sep 2014 #7

Same here. hifiguy Sep 2014 #17

I kept reading those headlines as "Jude Law" Nye Bevan Sep 2014 #28

Chalk me up under "so what?" NuclearDem Sep 2014 #8

Have not looked. cwydro Sep 2014 #24

she probably thought that the security was infallible on the cloud big_dog Sep 2014 #29

What's up with the deleted posts in this thread? Kingofalldems Sep 2014 #30

Some things were written that really shouldn't have been. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #31

And perhaps a belated realization... pinboy3niner Sep 2014 #42

I barely know who she is cwydro Sep 2014 #34

I for one don't care if she takes nude selfies for herself, her man, her woman.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2014 #35

All I know about Jennifer Lawrence mythology Sep 2014 #38

I wouldn't recognize her and don't care what pictures she takes privately. FLPanhandle Sep 2014 #40