Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
19. As far as the superweeds that you want to discuss, here are
Wed Sep 3, 2014, 07:54 PM
Sep 2014

Some considerations to take into account and can catch up on the subject:

In principle the new transgenic plants should pose the same environmental risks as new plants generated by traditional breeding.

In practice, it may prove that the risks from some transgenic novelties will considerably exceed the risks of the conventionally bred plants. Transgenes may be able to produce larger nd quicker jumps in adaptation

For instance, there is the possibility, whenever farmers employ the new GM seeds, there is a certain amount of risk of hybridization with trans gene infiltration into related weed and/or wild species of plants, that are occupying agricultural and /or disturbed sites and/or alteration of natural gene frequencies in these species.

Weeds that are presently inconsequential could become invigorated to the point that they become a more serious problem.

In the UK for example, Raybould and Gray 1993 examined the probability of introgression from crops into wild species, (both introduced wild weeds and indigenous species) and noted a range of probability from minimal to very high, depending on the particular crop and its wild relatives.

Weeds that are already very successful may become even more of a problem, once these changes occur.

So when you examine the Canadian farmers problem with the new superweeds, most of which I know of that came from the use of Gm rapeseed, then you realize that the fears of those early activists against Gm crops have been right all along.

Never forget for a minute that much of what constitutes the various methods and blueprints for creating Gm seeds came from e majoprity of researchers who were steeped in the mythology of the fact that a good deal of the DNA of a plant species is "empty DNA." That theory, of the junk-i-ness of the "empty" section of DNA, raged along all through the nineteen eighties and nineties. When it was finally discovered that the DNA portion considered to "be empty" actually contained no specific instructions for a specific part of a plant (or human being for that matter0 but instead, the vast "blank" DNA areas were all about the overall programming of the entity, then you realize why Gm seeds, crop and foodstuffs are such a terrible problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wake the hell up America newfie11 May 2013 #1
I agree. I think that Rachel started rolling over in her grave, truedelphi May 2013 #4
"2,4-D, a known carcinogen"? Starting when? Buzz Clik May 2013 #2
Yes, under the revolving door that is now used to "weed truedelphi May 2013 #5
It's not one extreme versus the other -- "known carcinogen" vs "totally safe" Buzz Clik May 2013 #6
If we ever got a Blue Ribbon Panel of scientists, headed by someone truedelphi May 2013 #14
What was wrong with the other panels? Buzz Clik May 2013 #15
DURec. bvar22 May 2013 #3
Fuss Over Guns? otohara May 2013 #7
Statistically speaking, your son and truedelphi May 2013 #9
Seeds of Freedom documentary - free to view online JohnyCanuck May 2013 #8
What a great link, and thank you for adding it to the discussion. truedelphi May 2013 #10
Another good video on the importance of maintaining bio-diversity in our seeds..... JohnyCanuck May 2013 #11
Factually incorrect statements abound in the OP. Motown_Johnny May 2013 #12
As to your point one that you want to discuss: truedelphi May 2013 #13
As far as the superweeds that you want to discuss, here are truedelphi Sep 2014 #19
use spell check and try again Motown_Johnny Sep 2014 #20
Sorry about the mis-spellings. truedelphi Sep 2014 #21
You can, but don't expect me to waste time on it n/t Motown_Johnny Sep 2014 #22
We're still here, and the food hasn't killed us yet. HuckleB Sep 2014 #16
Yes, but some of us have apparently had our brains affected, truedelphi Sep 2014 #17
So why are you parroting the organic industry's lines? HuckleB Sep 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»While we all fuss about g...»Reply #19