Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Iceland Gets it right~ Why No media coverage? [View all]mojowork_n
(2,354 posts)34. More on "more cronyism and smoke and mirrors"
The point I remembered from an article written last year:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/11/14/vulture-funds-gorge-on-stricken-economies/
..was that after it looked like the reasonable people were again in charge, with a clear
line of separation between the 'failed banks' and the 'still-good bank' the banksters
made huge speculative investments in the 'failed banks.' They went on a buying spree,
buying debt, in hopes of turning every bit of 'bad paper' in to profit, for themselves.
From the link, above:
The vultures became owners of two out of three new Icelandic banks. On IMF advice the government negotiated an agreement so loose as to give them a hunting license on Icelandic households and businesses. The new banks acted much as U.S. collection agencies do when they buy bad credit-card debts, bank loans or unpaid bills from retailers at 30 per cent of face value and then hound the debtors to squeeze out as much as they can, by hook or by crook.
These scavengers of the financial system are the bane of many states. But there is now a danger of their rising to the top of the international legal pyramid, to a point where they are in a position to oppress entire national economies.
Icelands case has a special twist. By law Icelandic mortgages and many other consumer loans are linked to the countrys soaring consumer price index. Owners of these loans not only can demand 100 per cent of face value, but also can add on the increase in debt principal from the indexing.
These scavengers of the financial system are the bane of many states. But there is now a danger of their rising to the top of the international legal pyramid, to a point where they are in a position to oppress entire national economies.
Icelands case has a special twist. By law Icelandic mortgages and many other consumer loans are linked to the countrys soaring consumer price index. Owners of these loans not only can demand 100 per cent of face value, but also can add on the increase in debt principal from the indexing.
And that's where we are, again. Big (BIG) money investors buying up future profits (current debt), on the cheap, expecting to be
"paid back" -- to the last aurar. (1 Krona = 100 Aurar)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Also we don't have the rapid change from a parliamentary system. They game between elections.
freshwest
Apr 2012
#37
Your answer is in your title -- because they got it right. And because "right" means that the
Nay
Apr 2012
#9
"Storytime" - interesting choice of words considering your post's basis in reality...
ExPatLeftist
Apr 2012
#23
From an expat living in Iceland for 16 years (and an Icelandic citizen) this is mostly inaccurate.
ExPatLeftist
Apr 2012
#21
Thanks for writing this, this is the very first thing I saw this morning and was
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2012
#31
exactly! the banks everywhere have been ripping off the people for years--why should we pay
librechik
Apr 2012
#22
Yes, after much suffering under IMF rules, Argentina defaulted on its debt
Lydia Leftcoast
Apr 2012
#48