Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Listen up, spuds. "Wreck havoc" is not a thing [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)150. That is a different point entirely.
It s necessary to call out another poster's mistake to teach that poster something, nor is it correct to assume that every poster is here to have grammar, spelling and usage corrected. Some adults very actively do NOT want that. Nor do I think the OP is a great teaching method. I am not even sure that was the intent.
The massacre of the English language continues unabated. I don't know why I bother.
Does that indicate an intent to teach?
I think Upaloopa's post teaches something too-and maybe something far more important than the difference between "wreck" and "wreak."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
248 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The New York Times Style Book said it goes inside and the NYT was so respected then that
merrily
Sep 2014
#133
Correct. That's a pet peeve of mine, too. I know the correct way, as you show, but
valerief
Sep 2014
#127
The other one that is like nails on the chalkboard is the incessant misuse of "free reign."
MADem
Sep 2014
#77
Or the misuse of the term "if you will", so overdone with that one
Dont call me Shirley
Sep 2014
#174
The Telegraph is probably not the place to be looking, they're hardly going to be innovative.
Spider Jerusalem
Sep 2014
#229
No time, just have a file on my desktop that I add to when I see particularly egregious examples. nt
X_Digger
Sep 2014
#190
People also need to learn the difference between "affect" and "effect"
Spider Jerusalem
Sep 2014
#52
That's right.. it's "wreak havoc".. thanks for the good ol Enlish Language reminder, radiclib
Cha
Sep 2014
#53
I was raised pronouncing it that way. My community pronounced it that way.
Luminous Animal
Sep 2014
#199
Writing for a college newspaper, I once typed 'respectfully' when I meant 'respectively'
pinboy3niner
Sep 2014
#79
Oh sure you think, your so smart. You probably the type to reply to any old gammer, eror.
Rex
Sep 2014
#94
Whinge, bespoke, aggro, anorak, bollocks, bloody, coriander, bum, aubergine, dodgy, knackered..
X_Digger
Sep 2014
#202
It used to be a thing -- wreck meant wreak until that usage began to die in the 19th century
fishwax
Sep 2014
#121
One might also "weck havoc" -- make a sandwich of it on a salted roll with caraway seeds
fishwax
Sep 2014
#123
The last time we went out to dinner, I had a havoc sandwich at a seafood restaurant.
George II
Sep 2014
#225
I used to teach for a living, but DU is not a classroom. Correcting adults in a classroom is
merrily
Sep 2014
#144
Humans are social. They learn from each other all the time in all kinds of ways.
Hissyspit
Sep 2014
#147
It appears that you have a problem with what is primarily African American vernacular.
Zorra
Sep 2014
#213
It appears you have a problem with making sweeping, uninformed, and incorrect assumptions....
George II
Sep 2014
#224
Wow, I should of knowed that. Don't loose faith. People like me still write good.
Vattel
Sep 2014
#194