Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gman

(24,780 posts)
6. To call it rape when it involves a 15, 16 or 17 YO
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 05:01 PM
Sep 2014

boy is ludicrous. It's bad policy and screws up the lives of good women. I don't know this woman or anything about her but her life is messed up forever. She is likely a great teacher. In higher education, a relationship between a teacher and a student is forbidden by rules and ethics. A college prof, make or female, would be fired for fraternization to this degree. And so should the woman in this case at a secondary school level. Enforcing ethics and rules are good for this type thing by protecting the integrity of the system. But tagging someone like her as a sex offender for life and a convicted felon is ridiculous. She'll never be a productive member of society again. Some say the boy didn't understand. Would a teenage boy's answer of. "Yes" be any different at 16 than it would be at 40?

Now if it's a male adult teacher and a female high school student, nail the SOB to the jail wall. Some things are not equal and this is a great example.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree that a man would get a longer sentence...most likely Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #1
WTF? no registration? NYC_SKP Sep 2014 #2
To answer your question -- Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2014 #3
even South Park wouldn't try that with the sexes reversed Psephos Sep 2014 #4
If a 33 year old male middle school teacher Jenoch Sep 2014 #5
Depends on state. In Montana, her sentence is 2x what a male teacher got, and no slut-shaming. politicat Sep 2014 #11
I remember that case. Jenoch Sep 2014 #42
Judge was censured. politicat Sep 2014 #47
To call it rape when it involves a 15, 16 or 17 YO Gman Sep 2014 #6
Poe? sub.theory Sep 2014 #7
Indeed! Veilex Sep 2014 #30
YUCK. That post was kept 2-5. alp227 Sep 2014 #37
More of their rape/child abuse apologia that was left by a jury (poster's account is under review) Turborama Sep 2014 #41
I think getting two hides within 12-24 hours = flag for review. nt alp227 Sep 2014 #43
Still shocked he was serious sub.theory Sep 2014 #45
She raped him, why should we call it anything different? Taitertots Sep 2014 #8
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #12
Correct me off I'm wrong but you seem to be saying Taitertots Sep 2014 #17
Just as in the opinion of those who think Gman Sep 2014 #19
There is absolutely nothing arbitrary about child abuse. Full stop. Veilex Sep 2014 #31
The "they used to do it in Texas" line isn't very convincing Taitertots Sep 2014 #39
So when I was buggered at about this age, should I have been grateful? AngryAmish Sep 2014 #9
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #14
I don't know how to respond to this. AngryAmish Sep 2014 #15
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #16
LOL, so how young is too young with your disgusting protocol? 14? 13? 12? 11? 10? Sick! nt Logical Sep 2014 #18
Honestly, you are sick. AngryAmish Sep 2014 #22
I have no idea what to say to the person you're responding to mythology Sep 2014 #35
Jury results for your post. Inkfreak Sep 2014 #29
Can I ask who alerted on this? AngryAmish Sep 2014 #36
most likely whichever poster was spamming statutory rape apologetics here. nt alp227 Sep 2014 #44
Ridiculous post. (nt) Inkfreak Sep 2014 #10
Wow, disgusting post. nt Logical Sep 2014 #13
Statutory rape is sometimes okay, and by 5:2 the jury agrees. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #20
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #21
Rape apologia is generally hidden. And I tend to agree with the reasons why. n/t lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #24
can we save this thread? AngryAmish Sep 2014 #25
Two other posts were kept. I tried to alert on that post linked here. alp227 Sep 2014 #40
Gman, can you elaborate on why it's okay for female teachers to have sex with their students... lumberjack_jeff Sep 2014 #23
sorry Gman, you are wrong Skittles Sep 2014 #32
You are exactly the juror I would look for if I were this woman's defense attorney. That is not a msanthrope Sep 2014 #34
Seriously? I checked with my husband (who's 48) and he assured me Heidi Sep 2014 #48
60 days for rape. Unbelievable. NYC Liberal Sep 2014 #26
See post 11 up thread. historylovr Sep 2014 #27
Yep. And it's disgusting. NYC Liberal Sep 2014 #28
Amen to that. historylovr Sep 2014 #33
WTF? 60 days? Not just rape, but rape by a person in a position of power. Nye Bevan Sep 2014 #38
This is par for the course, unfortunately. KitSileya Sep 2014 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Susan Duursma Sentenced t...»Reply #6