Susan Duursma Sentenced to Sixty Days in Jail for Sex Crime with Teen

[Turborama]

41. More of their rape/child abuse apologia that was left by a jury (poster's account is under review)

Just as in the opinion of those who think
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5490076

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Sigh. More apologetics for statutory rape from this user. It's annoying, over-the-top, and despicable, because the user is defending a teacher convicted of raping a student, based on the fact that "oh 12-year-old girls could get married in the past." Yuck. Before you consider this post just another opinion, do realize that a user has been banned for making similar remarks: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=115240&sub=trans

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Sep 5, 2014, 09:57 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I saw it as apologetics for child abuse, as well. I've always thought this one's a wrong'un.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: from QuayBlue: advocation of child rape? I think you're trolling, either way it's not funny. Hide this bullsh*t
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: the person has not used offensive language and was just stating his/her opinion.

Interestingly, their account under review even though the transparency page isn't visible: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=103453