Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

babylonsister

(172,778 posts)
Fri Sep 5, 2014, 04:47 PM Sep 2014

Obama Slays Another Republican Talking Point By Explaining His Strategy To Dismantle ISIS [View all]

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/09/05/obama-slays-republican-talking-point-explaining-strategy-dismantle-isis.html

Obama Slays Another Republican Talking Point By Explaining His Strategy To Dismantle ISIS
By: Jason Easley
Friday, September, 5th, 2014, 4:40 pm


During his press conference at the NATO summit today, President Obama put another Republican talking point out of its misery by explaining his strategy to dismantle ISIS.

Video @ link~

Transcript:

PRESIDENT OBAMA: You can’t contain an organization that is running roughshod through that much territory, causing that much havoc, displacing that many people, killing that many innocents, enslaving that many women. The goal has to be to dismantle them.

And if you look at what happened with al Qaeda in the FATA, where their primary base was, you initially push them back. You systematically degrade their capabilities. You narrow their scope of action. You slowly shrink the space, the territory that they may control. You take out their leadership. And over time, they are not able to conduct the same kinds of terrorist attacks as they once could.

As I said I think in my last press conference, given the nature of these organizations, are there potentially remnants of an organization that are still running around and hiding and still potentially plotting? Absolutely. And we will continue to hunt them down the same way we’re doing with remnants of al Qaeda in the FATA or elements of al-Shabaab in Somalia, or terrorists who operate anywhere around the world.

But what we can accomplish is to dismantle this network, this force that has claimed to control this much territory, so that they can’t do us harm. And that’s going to be our objective. And as I said before, I’m pleased to see that there’s unanimity among our friends and allies that that is a worthy goal and they are prepared to work with us in accomplishing that goal.


So much for the Republican talking point that the president doesn’t have a strategy to deal with ISIS. Obama has a proven track record of terrorist neutralization. His methods have worked in the past, and there is no reason that they won’t be effective in dealing with ISIS. Republicans going back to George W. Bush have refused to understand that terrorism can’t be defeated with an invading army. The concept of terrorism can’t be defeated with ground troops.

President Obama is correct. The best way to defeat terrorism is to neutralize the threat. Notice that President Obama didn’t use George W. Bush war on terror lingo. This president has more reality based understanding of what it takes to deal with a terrorist threat. ISIS wants to provoke the US into another ground war, but Obama isn’t going to fall for it.

The Obama strategy is better than the Republican strategy of sending a bunch of troops to invade a country that had nothing to do with the terrorist attack on American soil. It’s clear that the president has clear goal, while the only strategy that Republicans have is the one that let Osama Bin Laden roam free while American troops died in Iraq.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For the first time since George H.W. Bush..., kentuck Sep 2014 #1
No coalition? You seem to have forgotten the Moroccan land mine monkeys underpants Sep 2014 #4
:-) I had forgotten. kentuck Sep 2014 #13
They're like microwave popcorn underpants Sep 2014 #18
What is the meaning of the word "invading" karynnj Sep 2014 #44
GOP strategy = start war, worry about repercussions later. Rex Sep 2014 #2
I'd say their "strategy" is more like kentauros Sep 2014 #6
You forgot "tell buddies in the mass media to help out in the mass delusion". Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #9
I guess I meant to imply that kentauros Sep 2014 #15
True what was I thinking? They NEVER worry about consequences. Rex Sep 2014 #17
We should give credit when it is due, Recommending AuntPatsy Sep 2014 #3
When does the blockade of Saudi oil begin? GeorgeGist Sep 2014 #5
Never, but it should sub.theory Sep 2014 #8
Not as long as we're sucking on the Saudi oil teat meow2u3 Sep 2014 #12
Republican talking lie more like it. How much longer must the nation suffer these fools? Do we Fred Sanders Sep 2014 #7
Provocation jaxind Sep 2014 #10
Obama wants to dismantle all John McCain and Lindsay Graham's hard work?! Dont call me Shirley Sep 2014 #11
VIDEO in which President Obama puts another GOP talking point out of its misery: freshwest Sep 2014 #14
Quoting from the runaway best seller, "Republicanism For Dummies", world wide wally Sep 2014 #16
LOL, but way too true. Unfortunately. kairos12 Sep 2014 #20
He used too many big words & complete sentences NewJeffCT Sep 2014 #19
I know it's been said before but, denvine Sep 2014 #21
There is a spider that lives beneath the sand of the Sahara Desert that has not seen anything for so world wide wally Sep 2014 #22
Please, please, please, could we speed it up denvine Sep 2014 #26
welcome to DU Denvine madokie Sep 2014 #25
Thank you! denvine Sep 2014 #27
Corporate media and the GOP are not listening Iliyah Sep 2014 #23
This man that we have for a President today is not a shoot from the hip, get a lot of people killed madokie Sep 2014 #24
The foreign policy extremists need to back the fuck off this President. conservaphobe Sep 2014 #28
My goodness, 12 years of war, and you still think war helps? grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #33
I believe President Obama is using the correct and wisest strategy. Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #29
"Dismantling ISIS" is a strategy? Vattel Sep 2014 #30
I wondered if I was the only one MFrohike Sep 2014 #36
Paul Begala Tweet on the President and ISIS.. "So, while everyone was clucking over whether.. Cha Sep 2014 #31
OMG. It's a 1400 year old war. After these guys, there will be another. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #32
No it's not Scootaloo Sep 2014 #35
Fascinating! How did this group magically pop into being 3 years ago? Where did they come from? grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #37
It's more involved than you clearly have the attention span for. Scootaloo Sep 2014 #38
It's only 3 years:) Do you know about the original Shia/Sunni split? Or our funding of ISIS, Osama, grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #39
I have a strong understanding of all of that, yes. Which is why I'm sayingthis to you Scootaloo Sep 2014 #40
The goal is the same as the 1400 year old goal to create an Islamic caliphate, no? And when they grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #41
Which is completely different from your initial statement Scootaloo Sep 2014 #42
I'm just trying to find points of agreement wo we can find a solution. "We Can't Win It" - GWB grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #43
Any chance of backing Iraq, Syria, and Iran in their fight? Scootaloo Sep 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Slays Another Repub...