Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rocktivity

(45,006 posts)

11. Little to none of which she would have had the time, status, or money to accomplish

Reply to RiffRandell (Reply #10)

Fri Sep 5, 2014, 08:57 PM

Sep 2014

Last edited Sat Sep 6, 2014, 01:59 AM - Edit history (3)

If she weren't a high-end fashion model. I myself don't have any kind of problem with high-end fashion models -- I'm saying I think it's crappy that Under Armour is implying that there is.

I rest my case!

rocktivity

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don't Call Her "Just a Model". [View all] RiffRandell Sep 2014 OP

Well, she can do athletic things rocktivity Sep 2014 #1

Talk to Under Armour. RiffRandell Sep 2014 #2

Under Armour has MANUFACTURED a controversy. rocktivity Sep 2014 #6

I thought that referred to her haters on social media. RiffRandell Sep 2014 #7

DING DING DING! RiffRandell, you're our grand prize winner! rocktivity Sep 2014 #9

You really don't know that much about her, do you? RiffRandell Sep 2014 #10

Little to none of which she would have had the time, status, or money to accomplish rocktivity Sep 2014 #11

that is exactly what I was thinking.....those girls in that business cannot afford to lift VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #4

It sends a great message to women. RiffRandell Sep 2014 #5

Professional athlete? Of course not. hughee99 Sep 2014 #8

Staying focused on what matters is the smartest way to succeed. In_The_Wind Sep 2014 #3