Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why Kim Kardashian Is the Perfect Icon for Our Sick Society [View all]The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)19. From my understanding....
If she has done porn, been on magazine covers dressed certain ways, etc, she has exploited all women by feeding into patriarchal roles and stoking misogyny through images she puts forth of how women should look in society (nice dresses, makeup, high heels, how she interacts with others on her show.) So her victims are countless.
From Jezebel:
Kim has used her windfall in the genetics lottery to establish herself as one of the sexiest, most desired women in the world. That's fine. But by positioning herself that way there's an implication that other women who don't look like her are inferior. Perhaps it's unfair to blame Kim for that. Except it's not.
The fact of the matter is that nearly all of her endorsement deals and licensing projects have been based on commodifying women's insecuritiesthe same insecurities to which she actively contributes. QuickTrim, those sneakers that are supposed to help you have a nice ass that turned out to be completely bogus, makeup, fragrances, skincare, etc. They're all products that promise aesthetic perfection (literally). It's almost unethical, like someone breaking your legs and then trying to sell you crutches.
Those narrow and often times impossible beauty standards play so hard into the patriarchy that it's ludicrous to use them as an example of a feminist business model.
The fact of the matter is that nearly all of her endorsement deals and licensing projects have been based on commodifying women's insecuritiesthe same insecurities to which she actively contributes. QuickTrim, those sneakers that are supposed to help you have a nice ass that turned out to be completely bogus, makeup, fragrances, skincare, etc. They're all products that promise aesthetic perfection (literally). It's almost unethical, like someone breaking your legs and then trying to sell you crutches.
Those narrow and often times impossible beauty standards play so hard into the patriarchy that it's ludicrous to use them as an example of a feminist business model.
This was complimented by a similar discussion elsewhere:
The feminist selfie has been getting a whole lot of play on Twitter and Instagram. Erin Glorida Ryan wrote in her piece Selfies Arent Empowering. Theyre a Cry for Help for Jezebel: Selfies arent empowering; theyre a high tech reflection of the f*#ked up way society teaches women that their most important quality is their physical attractiveness. (note the mention of Kim's Book/selfies in the OP).
Are we supposed to be shocked that she owns her own body and uses her own image as she sees fit? Yet are we supposed to be as shocked by a swimsuit model who who would otherwise appear on a magazine cover for a sports magazine or in someone else's movie production? If not, why not?
As far as I am concerned, their body, their choice, not my business and more power to them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So charity gets only 10% of what she collects from Kim Kardashian. That's not enough.
Louisiana1976
Sep 2014
#77
Narcissist no-talent males have an easier time becoming Senator. Or President.
villager
Sep 2014
#52
I know, it's terrible. Something is horribly wrong with humanity, as opposed to the past
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#39
"Should that be glamorized and emulated by teenagers and young women, the target audience?"
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#37
A thin sham to cover up the fact that the institution is horribly antiquated; well past sell-by date
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#68
It is rather surprising that no one has started a palanquin service in LA.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#74
Hmm. I'm thinking Sun Tzu style, now. If it could somehow be promoted as a high-end exercise regime
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#76
People would pay through the NOSE to carry their favorite celebrities around.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#83
I wouldn't know her if I bumped into her on the street. She means squat to me.
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2014
#26
The Glorification Of Nothing - The Air Head Culture Personified - When Being Vacuous Is Celebrated
cantbeserious
Sep 2014
#29
Excellent points. There's a line that goes pure drivel drives out ordinary drivel or something like
Louisiana1976
Sep 2014
#81
i think our derision of her is partly misogyny. she is hardly the problem.
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2014
#41
charlie sheen was a mean asshole to many people and tom cruise was fucking crazy on the ellen show
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2014
#46
again, were any of them accused of being a symbol of what is wrong with america?
La Lioness Priyanka
Sep 2014
#57
Nailed it. Misogyny. Has to be. Bachmann, Coulter, Ingraham, Kelly - If men weren't so f'd up...
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2014
#55