Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Worst Book Review Ever Criticizes Slave History For Not Presenting 'Both Sides' [View all]treestar
(82,383 posts)35. free blacks who owned slaves were very rare
An oddity might occur; that doesn't make the system other than what it was.
These "arguments" are CSA apologist BS.
The white slaves one is even dumber - one was counted as black with any amount of black ancestry, no matter how little.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
129 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Worst Book Review Ever Criticizes Slave History For Not Presenting 'Both Sides' [View all]
applegrove
Sep 2014
OP
Like the DORK critic that questioned the validity of ' Twelve Years a Slave '
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2014
#1
We have time warped. Racism, sexism... the hate that gets spewed these days is disheartening. n/t
cui bono
Sep 2014
#12
Yes, you had not only an initial investment, but ongoing (if minimal) maintenance costs
Jackpine Radical
Sep 2014
#126
The funny thing is there were plenty of slaves we would consider white.
Exultant Democracy
Sep 2014
#6
I don't like to hear the thinking of slave owners. Read slave narratives in University
applegrove
Sep 2014
#7
Thomas Jefferson's 4 children by Sally Hemings were legally white, but slaves
carolinayellowdog
Sep 2014
#19
I wasn't aware of the law making octoroons legally white, thanks for the info
Exultant Democracy
Sep 2014
#72
Perfect response sadly which was wasted on a (won't say it) because people like that are
AuntPatsy
Sep 2014
#8
There are no limits nor depths to the harmful delusions of CSA apologists. And DU isn't immune.
Paladin
Sep 2014
#17
Confederate apologists were given free rein to write revisionist history
Cirque du So-What
Sep 2014
#18
Well yes, because we have a black President, therefore the legacy of slavery is long gone
YoungDemCA
Sep 2014
#71
That is precisely what you're saying. Kindly massas and grateful, happy slaves=Hail Dixieland.
Paladin
Sep 2014
#34
The contents of this thread ought to provide you with the evidence you need. (nt)
Paladin
Sep 2014
#75
I have to think that, given the opportunity, black slaves would have changed places
Maedhros
Sep 2014
#107
What I see is someone who wants to discuss how bad whites had it alongside a discussion on slavery.
KitSileya
Sep 2014
#45
Poor white resenting slaves, and slave feeling better than poor whites (or any whites)
KitSileya
Sep 2014
#52
No more and no less than a free discussion regarding the standard has to include the...
LanternWaste
Sep 2014
#98
It's an interesting post, but I'm afraid I'll have to correct you on one thing:
AverageJoe90
Sep 2014
#120
The Scots-Irish were a secondary power-group. But the aristocracy was largely Norman, not Anglo.
ieoeja
Sep 2014
#124
Regardless of the color of slave masters, slavery is wrong. The percentage of black owned slaves....
marble falls
Sep 2014
#122
If you read my post before yours, you will note that a lot of those Black slave "masters" were not.
ieoeja
Sep 2014
#125
Absolutely. Remember all the freed slaves begging to be taken back into slavery?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2014
#43
Is it your opinion that the movies exaggerated the evils of slavery?Are you suggesting that slavery
Douglas Carpenter
Sep 2014
#77
You ain't lying. DU lost its mind a while ago and the main way you could tell was the stream of
Number23
Sep 2014
#89
I am surprised any of you remain...it is so hostile here to minorities and Women
randys1
Sep 2014
#93
History is often a complicated subject.....But, truthfully, this reviewer missed the point.
AverageJoe90
Sep 2014
#118
"History is often a complicated subject" So true. I mean heck slavery has
cstanleytech
Sep 2014
#121
Nothing generates more conservative anger than information that contradicts their fairy tales.
Todays_Illusion
Sep 2014
#123
"this is not history; it is advocacy" one could argue that all history is advocacy
unblock
Sep 2014
#127