Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HRC has just written a glowing review of Kissinger's new book. STILL think we should nominate her? [View all]still_one
(98,883 posts)85. so educate me, here is your direct quote in the body
"As scared as I've seen the GOP this far out and losing big in Congress, they seem more concerned about her and that tells me volumes."
Perhaps when I work on my compression skills you should work on your writing skills
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HRC has just written a glowing review of Kissinger's new book. STILL think we should nominate her? [View all]
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
OP
People on the internets said that? Oh noes! Good thing polls say otherwise...
Metric System
Sep 2014
#69
Yeah, because pollsters have really proven to be objective, accurate and reliable.
Baitball Blogger
Sep 2014
#73
If you think there's something wrong with that comment, then alert on it. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Sep 2014
#76
I think there was Presidential talk for him as soon as he gave that first speech...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2014
#91
I saying people like you were claiming she was unbeatable last time. And Obama destroyed her. You...
Logical
Sep 2014
#93
but YOU see....everything doesn't happen the same way it did last time now DOES IT?
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2014
#94
She has no claim to any inherent superiority over any other possible Dem candidate.
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
#36
So did Ed Muskie, in September of 1970(and I point that out sadly, because I liked Muskie).
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
#58
I was up for voting against her in the Primaries. Now...well, it has made a difference as to my
libdem4life
Sep 2014
#19
Maybe, but if she did as you say "throw all the troops at it", it would have to be with Congress
still_one
Sep 2014
#31
Not really. She can send 'em in for sixty days without Congressional approval
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
#62
I voted "pass" because I didn't think we should nominate her before the Kissinger stuff. n/t
winter is coming
Sep 2014
#22
It doesn't change my mind as I was already not going to vote for her in the primary
davidpdx
Sep 2014
#23
I suspect a lot of folks on DU will have a problem if she becomes the nominee
still_one
Sep 2014
#28
No, we will hold our nose, eat light and take some pepto before casting out ballot for the Dem.
LiberalArkie
Sep 2014
#70
PASS ~ We should let the primaries nominate or not nominate her. Fair is fair.
BlueCaliDem
Sep 2014
#32
Um this is Democratic Underground you are at.....WTF does what Bill Clinton is going to do...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2014
#50
No, absolutely not. She lives in a different world, she obviously wants to be one of them, the
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#48
The other thread didn't CLAIM that "the revolution was just around the corner" and you know it.
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
#64
The person you quoted HAD no valid point, because nobody was doing what he accused people of there.
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
#66
There is nothing in the review that makes what she wrote inoffensive(I read the review).
Ken Burch
Sep 2014
#90
She was never even close to my first choice, to begin with. This just further disappoints me.
nomorenomore08
Sep 2014
#96