Should artists be paid a living wage?

[badtoworse]

131. So why don't you explain what makes it so artistic

I've been a serious photograper for almost 40 years and leaving the offensive aspects of Serrano's photograph aside, it's not particularly good. I understand using different lighting arrangements, use of soft focus, contrast, monochrome and a lot of other things that go into a technically good photograph. I recognize good composition when I see it. My tastes in photography are diversified: I personally do mostly landscapes, but I also do macro work, portraits and an occasional attempt at still life shots. I've subscribed to photography magazines for decades and have looked at hundreds of award winning photos that all use light in creative ways. I understand photography and have an informed opinion about it.

In my opinion, the picture was hailed as art because a number people (who are mostly ignorant about photography) wanted to demonstrate how open-minded they were by looking past the highly offensive subject matter and seeing a great photograph where none existed. If Serrano had put anything but a crucifix in the jar, the picture would not have been hailed; it would have been thrown in the garbage.