Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(13,869 posts)

8. Yes, some of them. I don't find "No shit" to be much of an improvement. nt

Sun Sep 7, 2014, 03:30 PM

Sep 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Shit ...1 [View all] pbmus Sep 2014 OP

http://www.wikihow.com/Write-Effective-Headlines Electric Monk Sep 2014 #1

Thanks for your comment and no need to be sorry ... nt pbmus Sep 2014 #4

Did you have the same snarky responses to the "WTF" series of posts? Wounded Bear Sep 2014 #7

Yes, some of them. I don't find "No shit" to be much of an improvement. nt Electric Monk Sep 2014 #8

It was obviously effective. It got you to view and answer the post. nt Live and Learn Sep 2014 #11

Spam is spam Hemmingway Sep 2014 #9

yes! Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #2

Millions and millions and millions of us, a handful of them. n/t RKP5637 Sep 2014 #3

You better believe it! ChisolmTrailDem Sep 2014 #5

Right on! Louisiana1976 Sep 2014 #6

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #10

Kicked and recommended! Get out there and VOTE! Enthusiast Sep 2014 #12

K&R ReRe Sep 2014 #13