Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
13. I am not endorsing the Ferguson thing, but police were probably relying on a local ordinance
Sun Sep 7, 2014, 05:26 PM
Sep 2014

against "loitering."

The difference between this action and Ferguson is as follows--those Mickey Dee's people blocked access because they WANTED to be arrested. See what happened? No one would know who the hell 81 year old Jose was if he stood on the picket line with a sign. No one would see him, and if they picked him out of a picture of a larger group of demonstrators, they wouldn't peg him for an octogenarian.

Now his face is seen round the world. His name and age--and where he works to make ends meet--are known to all. That was the point and the purpose of his civil disobedience.

In Ferguson, the community just wanted to protest a blatant, immediate and specific injustice--the murder of a teen by a police on their streets. They weren't interested in civil disobedience. They wanted to make it clear that they felt that police overreach had come to a crisis point. The police used selective enforcement of local laws to break up the demonstrations, and they also used violence.

The two incidents aren't the same at all, not in purpose, and not in execution. They both had a "fight the power" theme, but that's as far as the similarity goes.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I fully support sabbat hunter Sep 2014 #1
where is the traffic exemption in the bill of rights? questionseverything Sep 2014 #5
Peaceably to assemble--when you block traffic, you are disturbing the peace. MADem Sep 2014 #6
and in ferguson they told them they had to keep walking questionseverything Sep 2014 #10
I am not endorsing the Ferguson thing, but police were probably relying on a local ordinance MADem Sep 2014 #13
according to your thinking questionseverything Sep 2014 #14
Who was "blocking" the sidewalk? MADem Sep 2014 #15
Freedom of speech doesn't allow a person to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater. cheapdate Sep 2014 #9
because sabbat hunter Sep 2014 #24
Well aware? I think the purpose of blocking traffic WAS to get arrested. MADem Sep 2014 #8
I love this picture. xmas74 Sep 2014 #18
Me too--it's a human rights issue, and he's an icon! nt MADem Sep 2014 #20
I think a few have forgotten that with some protests xmas74 Sep 2014 #21
Look at all the police around him like he is some kind of dangerous criminal. SummerSnow Sep 2014 #2
He IS a dangerous criminal! Scootaloo Sep 2014 #3
How dare he, the nerve. SummerSnow Sep 2014 #12
Yet Criminals around the block demand 600%, and are protected . orpupilofnature57 Sep 2014 #4
+1 nt Live and Learn Sep 2014 #25
kick Liberal_in_LA Sep 2014 #7
It's a strategy called "Civil Disobedience" yallerdawg Sep 2014 #11
Precisely! nt MADem Sep 2014 #16
Powerful image, I hope it grows legs! Deadbeat Republicans Sep 2014 #17
What a great face marions ghost Sep 2014 #19
Why are union workshops exempt from SeaTac's $15 minimum wage law? garf Sep 2014 #22
What does this have to do with the post under which you're commenting? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #26
k&r rbrnmw Sep 2014 #23
He is awesome! littlemissmartypants Sep 2014 #27
Cheers! Laffy Kat Sep 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»81-year-old McDonald's wo...»Reply #13