Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
8. If it's genuinely a matter of covering costs, I don't have a problem with it.
Mon Sep 8, 2014, 12:11 PM
Sep 2014

They are claiming that the actual work involved costs $2350, and that the government has been subsidizing it. There is no valid reason for taxpayers to subsidize people who are leaving the system by their own choice.

You might have a point if the government were charging $10,000 or $50,000 for the purpose of punishing or profiting from those who are leaving, but $2,350 sounds reasonable for the amount of work involved. "Free society" doesn't mean "free ride".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

$2350 still isn't a lot. Xithras Sep 2014 #1
Yes but.. GummyBearz Sep 2014 #2
Concern noted. PeaceNikki Sep 2014 #4
yikes... GummyBearz Sep 2014 #6
If it's genuinely a matter of covering costs, I don't have a problem with it. Xithras Sep 2014 #8
I cant disagree GummyBearz Sep 2014 #9
Mixed Feelings About The Fee Raise Vogon_Glory Sep 2014 #3
Mostly agree GummyBearz Sep 2014 #5
It is dishonest to claim one is being 'kept in' because one is charged a fee when one rejects one's Bluenorthwest Sep 2014 #7
Still not expensive enough. nt conservaphobe Sep 2014 #10
yea GummyBearz Sep 2014 #11
That bait is not red enough... make it redder. nt conservaphobe Sep 2014 #12
good point GummyBearz Sep 2014 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Renouncing U.S. citizensh...»Reply #8