Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: some women will put up with anything for money [View all]beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)59. But we did get it right on this one:
On Tue Sep 9, 2014, 12:07 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
uterus or no it's still my baby too and i will not stfu about it. try reading it helps
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5505672
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Doubling down on TWO anti choice/forced birth posts that were hidden 6-1 - both post #110 and another post from earlier http://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5206465 (provided link due to typo in post #108).
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Sep 9, 2014, 12:30 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Post 110 said "force was hyperbole like i can really force someone to give birth". And it was hidden. Why hide this one too? This seems like a stupid alert-fight.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I understand that the party with the uterus carries a more medical burden during pregnancy, and personally I would defer to the woman's position on this. But a person raising the argument that the father is also a stakeholder should not be shouted down. Disagree if you are so moved, but there is no need to be belligerent about it.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: It's been obvious for some time that this poster should take his opinions somewhere else.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I've seen enough. Misogyny, like racism, has no place on DU. Wish I could do more than hide this post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't like this apparent effort to get repeated posts hidden on this guy. It stinks. He's expressing his views, it's not offensive, lay off.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
uterus or no it's still my baby too and i will not stfu about it. try reading it helps
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5505672
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Doubling down on TWO anti choice/forced birth posts that were hidden 6-1 - both post #110 and another post from earlier http://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5206465 (provided link due to typo in post #108).
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Sep 9, 2014, 12:30 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Post 110 said "force was hyperbole like i can really force someone to give birth". And it was hidden. Why hide this one too? This seems like a stupid alert-fight.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I understand that the party with the uterus carries a more medical burden during pregnancy, and personally I would defer to the woman's position on this. But a person raising the argument that the father is also a stakeholder should not be shouted down. Disagree if you are so moved, but there is no need to be belligerent about it.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: It's been obvious for some time that this poster should take his opinions somewhere else.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I've seen enough. Misogyny, like racism, has no place on DU. Wish I could do more than hide this post.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't like this apparent effort to get repeated posts hidden on this guy. It stinks. He's expressing his views, it's not offensive, lay off.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
87 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The poster really suggested that? If so I apologize for my misinterpretation and am disgusted.
alp227
Sep 2014
#55
Just where did you read/hear "Hey, she gets paid well for those beatings." ?
Gidney N Cloyd
Sep 2014
#2
So is presentation and context. If the whole post is a quote from another site then...
Gidney N Cloyd
Sep 2014
#6
to you it may. If you would like to address my sentence structure and grammar
boston bean
Sep 2014
#7
Well, using the correct phrase didn't have the tiny number of results he wanted. (nt)
jeff47
Sep 2014
#31
It's not just physical abuse. There are many people who enjoy dishing out mental abuse.
BlueJazz
Sep 2014
#25
To me, it's another form of abuse. All types of abuse/power seem to be about degrading the ...
BlueJazz
Sep 2014
#42
This one wasn't silent, the whole world saw the abuse. They were both charged with assault.
mackerel
Sep 2014
#29
The fact that the beatings are happening isn't nearly as disturbing as the defense of them.
Spitfire of ATJ
Sep 2014
#39
a very depressed k and r that this sort of thing NEEDS to be reposted again and again, even
niyad
Sep 2014
#40
according to MRA stats, this was reciprocal violence where the woman was the aggressor
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#46