Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

another_liberal

(8,821 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2014, 03:19 PM Sep 2014

Will air assault against IS in Syria be used to effect regime change? [View all]

It would be tempting to use the pretext of attacking Islamic State targets to also degrade Assad's defenses, as well as his offensive assets. That could conceivably give the moderate faction anti-Assad forces a big boost. Nonetheless, it would be a dangerous proposition for our President to order such attacks on Syrian troops. They would very likely shoot back, and shoot back with some quite new and sophisticated AA capabilities. What if American planes are shot down, perhaps Americans captured? What then?


Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov adresses to his Malian counterpart Abdoulaye Diop (not pictured) during their meeting in Moscow, September 9, 2014. (Reuters)

Lavrov: West may use ISIS as pretext to bomb Syrian govt forces

If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said. “There are reasons to suspect that air strikes on Syrian territory may target not only areas controlled by Islamic State militants, but the government troops may also be attacked on the quiet to weaken the positions of Bashar Assad’s army,” Lavrov said Tuesday.

Such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa, Lavrov told reporters in Moscow after a meeting with the foreign minister of Mali. Moscow is urging the West to respect international law and undertake such acts only with the approval of the legitimate government of a state, Lavrov said. “Not a single country should have its own plans on such issues. There can be only combined, collective, univocal actions. Only this way can a result be achieved,” he said.

His comments came shortly after Washington announced plans to go on the offensive against the Islamic State jihadist group. The US military has already launched over 100 airstrikes against militant targets in Iraq, including a new series that the military said killed an unusually large number of Islamic State fighters, AP reported.

(snip)

Moscow has repeatedly voiced its readiness to cooperate with Washington in countering terrorism, Lavrov said. Secretary of State John Kerry, in response, has proposed that the US, Russia and countries in the region cooperate to work out “a balance of interests so that they could eliminate terrorism threat,” he added, “However, this hasn’t got beyond words”.

(snip)


Read more at: http://rt.com/news/186356-lavrov-syria-bombing-west/

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RT. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #1
Ad Hominem attack FAIL. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #3
Is this "ad hominem" as well? Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #18
Thank goodness there's still some honest folks in this debate, unlike the online propagandists. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #21
It's nice to see they present opposing views;) grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #22
Yeah. Let's go with that. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #23
personally I try to treat EVERY news source with a critical eye that looks for the holes KurtNYC Sep 2014 #24
TYT/Buzzfeed: "Russia's Online Troll Army Is Huge, Hilarious & Already Everywhere " Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #26
Same thing the NSA does here... grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #28
Yup. Exactly the same! Only Different. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #30
You would know;) grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #31
Hehe... SidDithers Sep 2014 #29
We know "Russian Online Troll Army is huge"! Always popping up with their distractions.. Cha Sep 2014 #35
The Op isn't even about President Putin . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #36
OMFG! William769 Sep 2014 #37
Like I said . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #40
Go for it! William769 Sep 2014 #41
When you are doing such a good job of proving my point? another_liberal Sep 2014 #43
LOL.. the OP is about RT. End of story. P.S. I'm not reading any RT Shite. Cha Sep 2014 #44
Didn't bother to read any of it, right? another_liberal Sep 2014 #45
"You are disrupting the flow of the conversation here with your off-topic........" Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #47
Good job! William769 Sep 2014 #39
Glad you saw this, William.. I got it from my Journal and had thanked Cha Sep 2014 #42
Lets try to stick to the topic of the OP, alright? another_liberal Sep 2014 #38
But there's an "army of Putin trolls" who've swooped down on us from the Kremlin. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #46
Write your own OP on that topic then . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #50
Your Opinions Are The Topic, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #54
Who better to tell us what Lavrov is saying? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2014 #11
Russia can stop all of this jamzrockz Sep 2014 #2
We can stop all of this by arming working with Assad, Iran, Israel, SA, Turkey, et al., to help THEM grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #5
Why even do anything? jamzrockz Sep 2014 #7
I have to agree. It seems to me ISIS may be the perfect thing to bring these disparate entities grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #9
Would the United States, Turkey, Israel or other Mid-East powers be willing . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #8
If you have been watching jamzrockz Sep 2014 #12
I've had seen no reason to take offense . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #15
There's a real question about what happens if Assad asks Russia for help. Xithras Sep 2014 #17
It would be advisable to avoid bombing in Syria . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #19
the pretext would probably not be the air strikes but the presence of ISIS itself KurtNYC Sep 2014 #4
Good point . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #10
The government in Iraq wants to attack ISIS. In Syria the government did not attack ISIS pampango Sep 2014 #16
June 24, 2014 - the Syrian Airforce struck ISIS in Iraq KurtNYC Sep 2014 #51
"ISIS has spent most of the past 18 months avoiding actually fighting the Syrian government, pampango Sep 2014 #53
Links KurtNYC Sep 2014 #56
All your links reference Syrian airstrikes on ISIS - oddly - in western Iraq, not in Syria. pampango Sep 2014 #58
Yes, of course, this has been the neocon plan since day 1: grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #6
Obama's speech will be one year to the day of his speech requesting authroization to bomb Assad. morningfog Sep 2014 #13
I had never seen that video clip before . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #14
a few years later and this is what he has to say nationalize the fed Sep 2014 #48
It would appear the Military/Industrial Complex guys got to the good General meantime . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #49
Don't rule that out malaise Sep 2014 #20
Is a rehabilitated Dick Cheney the kind of thing we should expect now? another_liberal Sep 2014 #33
I can't take any more of this madness malaise Sep 2014 #34
RT. LOL...nt SidDithers Sep 2014 #25
Not to split hairs but OPs subject could confuse some. Anansi1171 Sep 2014 #27
A series of air strikes is often referred to as an air assault . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #32
Lavrov's CT's about bombing Syria are just that Obama isn't going to do it. davidpdx Sep 2014 #52
The Only Way Assad's Forces Would Come Under Fire, Sir, Is If They Tried To Interfere The Magistrate Sep 2014 #55
The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men Gang aft agley Robert Burns Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will air assault against ...