Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Al Franken Drops a TRUTH BOMB On The Senate: CITIZENS UNITED IS MONEY LAUNDERING [View all]
As the Senate continues to debate final passage of a constitutional amendment that would overturn Citizens United, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) came to the Senate floor and called Citizens United money laundering that was made legal by the Supreme Court. During his remarks on the Senate floor, Sen. Franken said,
This is real, M. President: spending by outside groups more than tripled from the 2008 presidential election to the 2012 presidential election, when it topped a billion dollars thats billion with a b. What happened in the interim? Well Citizens United was decided in 2010 the floodgates were opened.
And, worse still, the middle-class isnt just being flooded; its being blindfolded, too because these wealthy special interest groups often can spend the money anonymously, so voters have no idea whos behind the endless attack ads that fill the airwaves. Heres how it works: if you have millions of dollars that you want to spend, you can funnel it through back channels so that it ends up in the hands of a group typically one with a generic and benign-sounding name that uses the money to buy ads, often without disclosing the source of its funds.
This whole thing looks to me a lot like money laundering except that its now perfectly legal. And, again, this is real: a study just came out which showed that, in the current election cycle alone, theres already been over 150,000 ads run by groups that dont have to disclose the source of their funding.
And get this: things are only getting worse. Earlier this year, in a case called McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court was at it again, recklessly doing away with a law that prohibited people from giving more than $123,000, in the aggregate, directly to candidates in an election cycle. One-hundred-and-twenty-three-thousand-dollars. Who has that kind of money lying around to spend on elections? The super-rich, maybe. But the middle class sure doesnt. The folks I meet with in Minnesota who are trying to make ends meet, pay off their student loans, train for a new job, save some money to start a family they sure dont. And those are the folks who most need a voice here in Washington.
.
So the way I see it is this: there are two ways that we can go from here. On the one hand, we can continue to let Citizens United be the law of the land. We can perpetuate the fallacy that corporations have a constitutional right to flood our elections with undisclosed money; we can let deep-pocketed special interests buy influence and access and then set the agenda for the rest of the country.
Or Or, we can say, enough is enough. We can restore the law to what it was before Citizens United was decided and, more to the point, we can restore a voice for millions upon millions of everyday Americans who want nothing more than to see their government represent them.
http://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=news&id=2936
And, worse still, the middle-class isnt just being flooded; its being blindfolded, too because these wealthy special interest groups often can spend the money anonymously, so voters have no idea whos behind the endless attack ads that fill the airwaves. Heres how it works: if you have millions of dollars that you want to spend, you can funnel it through back channels so that it ends up in the hands of a group typically one with a generic and benign-sounding name that uses the money to buy ads, often without disclosing the source of its funds.
This whole thing looks to me a lot like money laundering except that its now perfectly legal. And, again, this is real: a study just came out which showed that, in the current election cycle alone, theres already been over 150,000 ads run by groups that dont have to disclose the source of their funding.
And get this: things are only getting worse. Earlier this year, in a case called McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court was at it again, recklessly doing away with a law that prohibited people from giving more than $123,000, in the aggregate, directly to candidates in an election cycle. One-hundred-and-twenty-three-thousand-dollars. Who has that kind of money lying around to spend on elections? The super-rich, maybe. But the middle class sure doesnt. The folks I meet with in Minnesota who are trying to make ends meet, pay off their student loans, train for a new job, save some money to start a family they sure dont. And those are the folks who most need a voice here in Washington.
.
So the way I see it is this: there are two ways that we can go from here. On the one hand, we can continue to let Citizens United be the law of the land. We can perpetuate the fallacy that corporations have a constitutional right to flood our elections with undisclosed money; we can let deep-pocketed special interests buy influence and access and then set the agenda for the rest of the country.
Or Or, we can say, enough is enough. We can restore the law to what it was before Citizens United was decided and, more to the point, we can restore a voice for millions upon millions of everyday Americans who want nothing more than to see their government represent them.
http://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=news&id=2936
The majority of Senate Republicans, including Mitch McConnell, voted with Democrats yesterday to advance a constitutional amendment that would overturn Citizens United. The vote was not a vote on final passage. It was a vote to move towards debate and vote on passage. By not filibustering the bill yesterday, Senate Republicans have given Democrats a platform this week to discuss the attempts by right-wing billionaires and special interests to buy the government. Senate Republicans tried to pull the wool over the eyes of the American people yesterday by casting a vote to move legislation forward that they have no intention of voting to pass. Republicans are hoping that you wont notice when they vote against the constitutional amendment later this week.
cont'
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/09/09/al-franken-drops-truth-bomb-senate-citizens-united-money-laundering.html
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Al Franken Drops a TRUTH BOMB On The Senate: CITIZENS UNITED IS MONEY LAUNDERING [View all]
Segami
Sep 2014
OP
Nothing and it was what Obama warned people of when Citizens United passed and urged citizens to
freshwest
Sep 2014
#36
politicians no longer have any need for the truth. their lies get them elected.
spanone
Sep 2014
#30
Thanks for stating the obvious. Organized crime can fund a candidate now.
McCamy Taylor
Sep 2014
#31
Yes, it is money laundering. Just like the Iraq War was. Greatest transfer of wealth ever.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#32
I appreciate that Senator Franken has kept a low profile as a new Senator and I am glad to see him
Todays_Illusion
Sep 2014
#34