Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Tue Sep 9, 2014, 07:38 PM Sep 2014

Al Franken Drops a TRUTH BOMB On The Senate: CITIZENS UNITED IS MONEY LAUNDERING [View all]






As the Senate continues to debate final passage of a constitutional amendment that would overturn Citizens United, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) came to the Senate floor and called Citizens United money laundering that was made legal by the Supreme Court. During his remarks on the Senate floor, Sen. Franken said,



This is real, M. President: spending by outside groups more than tripled from the 2008 presidential election to the 2012 presidential election, when it topped a billion dollars – that’s billion with a “b.” What happened in the interim? Well Citizens United was decided in 2010 – the floodgates were opened.

And, worse still, the middle-class isn’t just being flooded; it’s being blindfolded, too – because these wealthy special interest groups often can spend the money anonymously, so voters have no idea who’s behind the endless attack ads that fill the airwaves. Here’s how it works: if you have millions of dollars that you want to spend, you can funnel it through back channels so that it ends up in the hands of a group – typically one with a generic and benign-sounding name – that uses the money to buy ads, often without disclosing the source of its funds.

This whole thing looks to me a lot like money laundering – except that it’s now perfectly legal. And, again, this is real: a study just came out which showed that, in the current election cycle alone, there’s already been over 150,000 ads run by groups that don’t have to disclose the source of their funding.

And get this: things are only getting worse. Earlier this year, in a case called McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court was at it again, recklessly doing away with a law that prohibited people from giving more than $123,000, in the aggregate, directly to candidates in an election cycle. One-hundred-and-twenty-three-thousand-dollars. Who has that kind of money lying around to spend on elections? The super-rich, maybe. But the middle class sure doesn’t. The folks I meet with in Minnesota – who are trying to make ends meet, pay off their student loans, train for a new job, save some money to start a family – they sure don’t. And those are the folks who most need a voice here in Washington.

….

So the way I see it is this: there are two ways that we can go from here. On the one hand, we can continue to let Citizens United be the law of the land. We can perpetuate the fallacy that corporations have a constitutional right to flood our elections with undisclosed money; we can let deep-pocketed special interests buy influence and access – and then set the agenda for the rest of the country.

Or … Or, we can say, enough is enough. We can restore the law to what it was before Citizens United was decided – and, more to the point, we can restore a voice for millions upon millions of everyday Americans who want nothing more than to see their government represent them.

http://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=news&id=2936



The majority of Senate Republicans, including Mitch McConnell, voted with Democrats yesterday to advance a constitutional amendment that would overturn Citizens United. The vote was not a vote on final passage. It was a vote to move towards debate and vote on passage. By not filibustering the bill yesterday, Senate Republicans have given Democrats a platform this week to discuss the attempts by right-wing billionaires and special interests to buy the government. Senate Republicans tried to pull the wool over the eyes of the American people yesterday by casting a vote to move legislation forward that they have no intention of voting to pass. Republicans are hoping that you won’t notice when they vote against the constitutional amendment later this week.




cont'

http://www.politicususa.com/2014/09/09/al-franken-drops-truth-bomb-senate-citizens-united-money-laundering.html
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2014 #1
K&R !!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2014 #2
Good for him. We need a lot more honesty about the shenanigans Cleita Sep 2014 #3
This is where he can shine BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #4
I live in Mn and haven't seen any polls for Al's senate race...... a kennedy Sep 2014 #5
I was hoping he would be more outspoken BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #6
1st term Senators as a rule keep quiet underpants Sep 2014 #13
Tell it to Liz Warren. Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #15
It's usually smart to learn the ropes BrotherIvan Sep 2014 #20
I love him geardaddy Sep 2014 #40
He is ahead by 8-9 but McFadden is closing ... SomeGuyInEagan Sep 2014 #41
Alright, that does it. Mister Ed Sep 2014 #7
I just sent him one on Sunday. ANOIS Sep 2014 #21
I always use act blue. pennylane100 Sep 2014 #24
I give him money on a regular basis. I just send him a check. DFW Sep 2014 #35
Just wondering rickyhall Sep 2014 #8
Nothing Demeter Sep 2014 #11
Foreign Money in U.S. Elections Segami Sep 2014 #12
Like the Saudis? Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #19
Nothing and it was what Obama warned people of when Citizens United passed and urged citizens to freshwest Sep 2014 #36
K&R n/t lordsummerisle Sep 2014 #9
I think he meant "influence buying" or "bribery" Demeter Sep 2014 #10
But couldn't it be money laundered from foreign sources? Jackpine Radical Sep 2014 #17
Of course, it's bribery - in an untraditional form, however. closeupready Sep 2014 #45
And bribery. yourout Sep 2014 #14
Franken ROCKS IT!!!!! ailsagirl Sep 2014 #16
Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Sep 2014 #18
YES, YES, YES, YES! TexasMommaWithAHat Sep 2014 #22
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2014 #23
K#79 & K n/t UTUSN Sep 2014 #25
Facts are out there? Why do these crimes continue? AuntPatsy Sep 2014 #26
Voters who stay home, or even worse, don't care because for several reasons: freshwest Sep 2014 #33
freedumb Perfect AuntPatsy Sep 2014 #51
They should also consider that our govt could be bought Ilsa Sep 2014 #27
Franken is all we could hope him to be. R&K nt longship Sep 2014 #28
He is such a smart guy. A sober liberal. EEO Sep 2014 #29
politicians no longer have any need for the truth. their lies get them elected. spanone Sep 2014 #30
Al Franken definitely is an exception ailsagirl Sep 2014 #48
Thanks for stating the obvious. Organized crime can fund a candidate now. McCamy Taylor Sep 2014 #31
Yes, it is money laundering. Just like the Iraq War was. Greatest transfer of wealth ever. freshwest Sep 2014 #32
I appreciate that Senator Franken has kept a low profile as a new Senator and I am glad to see him Todays_Illusion Sep 2014 #34
Bravo! valerief Sep 2014 #37
Wish I could vote for him. Xyzse Sep 2014 #38
You could if he was running for prez....... navarth Sep 2014 #46
Yeah, I know. Xyzse Sep 2014 #47
K&R - n/t fleur-de-lisa Sep 2014 #39
YES! MONEY LAUNDERING ... made legal by the worst Supreme Court in history. Maineman Sep 2014 #42
Franken might be the best senator in DC, him and Elizabeth Warren. Imagine if we had a hundred Maineman Sep 2014 #43
So is AIPAC. NorthCarolina Sep 2014 #44
Great post JanT Sep 2014 #49
he's right! and it is shocking samsingh Sep 2014 #50
That why Al is our Senator. 99Forever Sep 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Al Franken Drops a TRUTH ...