Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cha

(297,963 posts)
35. We know "Russian Online Troll Army is huge"! Always popping up with their distractions..
Tue Sep 9, 2014, 09:52 PM
Sep 2014

"NSA- but but but the West-Leave Russia Alone Wah Wah Wah



It's Okay for Putin.. 'cause you know.. he's not President Obama!


Putin’s grip on the internet

snip//

The precedent of persecuting bloggers to silence them was set in 2008, a year after a blogger Savva Terentyev criticised police in a comment on a LiveJournal post he was sentenced to one year suspended sentence, article 282 of Russian Criminal Code for, “fomenting of social hatred” towards policemen. Since then, article 282, which covers actions provoking animosity and hatred towards certain religious, social, gender or national groups has been used to silence bloggers through the courts.

The other charge commonly used against internet users is “extremism” . Throughout Putin’s reign this charge has been used to target people who criticise the Kremlin — together with defamation and drug legislation. Russia’s Department of Presidential Affairs won three defamation lawsuits against newspaper Novaya Gazeta in just one week last year. All the articles talked about this authority’s controversial withdrawals from Russian budget and extremely high salaries of its staff. The editor-in-chief Dmitry Muratov told Index that Kremlin has been using defamation suits as a censorship instrument.


snip//

Starting from 1 November 2012 Russian authorities won’t need a court ruling, like they did in the Terentyev case. Authorities will appeal to ISPs, like in the Rumyantsev case, create website blacklists and will be able to actually shut down anything they won’t like. Previously, a court ruling could make a website or the URL of a certain web content inaccessible in a specific region, while it stayed available in another.

Andrey Soldatov, an expert on Russian security services, notes that soon “the Kremlin will have at its disposal the facilities for blocking access to internet resources across the whole of Russia”, including Skype and Facebook."

http://uncut.indexoncensorship.org/2012/08/putins-russia-internet-censorship/

More recently..

snip// March 20, 2014

Putin ramps up Internet censorship, citing Google and Snowden to ensure public support


On March 13, a half-dozen highly trafficked opposition blogs and indie media outlets were suddenly blocked within Russia. The websites — including the highly respected Ekho Moskvy radio station and the blog of popular nationalist opposition politician, Alexei Navalny — received no notice of the impeding cutoff.

There was no court order, no trial, not even a public hearing. But there’s no doubt the move was official: Roskomnadzor, Russia’s mass media and telecommunications regulator, very publicly announced it in a directive to Russian ISPs, explaining that access to these websites must be blocked for extremism and for encouraging people to attend unsanctioned protests — in this case, against Russia’s annexation of Crimea.

This new formal power to unilaterally block access to any website comes via a brand new Internet censorship law that went into effect on February 1, 2014. It’s called the “Law of Lugovoi” — named after its author, State Duma Deputy Andrei Lugovoi, a scary ex-FSB officer-turned-Duma deputy who is better known as the prime suspect in the 2007 polonium assassination of Alexander Litvinenko in London.

Russia has refused to extradite Lugovoi to the UK to face trial and has instead allowed him to make a second career for himself as an ambitious legislator in Russia’s lower house of parliament. Lugovoi has put his personal stamp on plenty of bills, including ones that limit free speech and expand the power of the FSB. (He’s also know for periodically issuing veiled death threats against opposition politicians.)

http://pando.com/2014/03/20/putin-ramps-up-internet-censorship-citing-google-and-snowden-to-ensure-public-support/


Russia Today Anchor Admits Spreading 'Lies' For Putin
By Catherine Taibi @cathtaibi

Another Russia Today anchor has resigned from her post at the Kremlin-funded TV network. I resigned from RT today. I have huge respect for many in the team, but I'm for the truth. pic.twitter.com/m...
HuffPost Media @HuffPostMedia

46 Retweets 7 favorites

Corespondent Sara Firth's announcement came nearly two hours after she stated on Twitter that RT anchors "do work for Putin" and spread "lies," in a conversation with RT London correspondent Polly Boiko. Firth alleged that the network asks its anchors to "obscure the truth," and now she is saying she's had enough.

Polly Boiko @Polly_Boiko

@ukTanos what am i spreading?

Sara Firth @Sara__Firth
Follow
@Polly_Boiko @ukTanos Lies hun. We do work for Putin. We are asked on a daily basis if not to totally ignore then to obscure the truth

11:50 PM - 17 Jul 2014 550 Retweets 175 favorites

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/18/sara-firth-resigns-russia-today-lies-anchor_n_5598815.html



Thanks for the Vid on "Putin's trolls", Tarheel~

RT. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #1
Ad Hominem attack FAIL. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #3
Is this "ad hominem" as well? Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #18
Thank goodness there's still some honest folks in this debate, unlike the online propagandists. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #21
It's nice to see they present opposing views;) grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #22
Yeah. Let's go with that. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #23
personally I try to treat EVERY news source with a critical eye that looks for the holes KurtNYC Sep 2014 #24
TYT/Buzzfeed: "Russia's Online Troll Army Is Huge, Hilarious & Already Everywhere " Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #26
Same thing the NSA does here... grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #28
Yup. Exactly the same! Only Different. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #30
You would know;) grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #31
Hehe... SidDithers Sep 2014 #29
We know "Russian Online Troll Army is huge"! Always popping up with their distractions.. Cha Sep 2014 #35
The Op isn't even about President Putin . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #36
OMFG! William769 Sep 2014 #37
Like I said . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #40
Go for it! William769 Sep 2014 #41
When you are doing such a good job of proving my point? another_liberal Sep 2014 #43
LOL.. the OP is about RT. End of story. P.S. I'm not reading any RT Shite. Cha Sep 2014 #44
Didn't bother to read any of it, right? another_liberal Sep 2014 #45
"You are disrupting the flow of the conversation here with your off-topic........" Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #47
Good job! William769 Sep 2014 #39
Glad you saw this, William.. I got it from my Journal and had thanked Cha Sep 2014 #42
Lets try to stick to the topic of the OP, alright? another_liberal Sep 2014 #38
But there's an "army of Putin trolls" who've swooped down on us from the Kremlin. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #46
Write your own OP on that topic then . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #50
Your Opinions Are The Topic, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #54
Who better to tell us what Lavrov is saying? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2014 #11
Russia can stop all of this jamzrockz Sep 2014 #2
We can stop all of this by arming working with Assad, Iran, Israel, SA, Turkey, et al., to help THEM grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #5
Why even do anything? jamzrockz Sep 2014 #7
I have to agree. It seems to me ISIS may be the perfect thing to bring these disparate entities grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #9
Would the United States, Turkey, Israel or other Mid-East powers be willing . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #8
If you have been watching jamzrockz Sep 2014 #12
I've had seen no reason to take offense . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #15
There's a real question about what happens if Assad asks Russia for help. Xithras Sep 2014 #17
It would be advisable to avoid bombing in Syria . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #19
the pretext would probably not be the air strikes but the presence of ISIS itself KurtNYC Sep 2014 #4
Good point . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #10
The government in Iraq wants to attack ISIS. In Syria the government did not attack ISIS pampango Sep 2014 #16
June 24, 2014 - the Syrian Airforce struck ISIS in Iraq KurtNYC Sep 2014 #51
"ISIS has spent most of the past 18 months avoiding actually fighting the Syrian government, pampango Sep 2014 #53
Links KurtNYC Sep 2014 #56
All your links reference Syrian airstrikes on ISIS - oddly - in western Iraq, not in Syria. pampango Sep 2014 #58
Yes, of course, this has been the neocon plan since day 1: grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #6
Obama's speech will be one year to the day of his speech requesting authroization to bomb Assad. morningfog Sep 2014 #13
I had never seen that video clip before . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #14
a few years later and this is what he has to say nationalize the fed Sep 2014 #48
It would appear the Military/Industrial Complex guys got to the good General meantime . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #49
Don't rule that out malaise Sep 2014 #20
Is a rehabilitated Dick Cheney the kind of thing we should expect now? another_liberal Sep 2014 #33
I can't take any more of this madness malaise Sep 2014 #34
RT. LOL...nt SidDithers Sep 2014 #25
Not to split hairs but OPs subject could confuse some. Anansi1171 Sep 2014 #27
A series of air strikes is often referred to as an air assault . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #32
Lavrov's CT's about bombing Syria are just that Obama isn't going to do it. davidpdx Sep 2014 #52
The Only Way Assad's Forces Would Come Under Fire, Sir, Is If They Tried To Interfere The Magistrate Sep 2014 #55
The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men Gang aft agley Robert Burns Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will air assault against ...»Reply #35