Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The IMF’s New Cold War Loan to Ukraine [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)18. Larry Summers to address Yalta European Strategy (YES) conference, being held in Kiev this year...
He's like a vampire of voodoo economics: Sunlight lands on the guy but it doesn't stick.
The Globalizer Who Came In From the Cold
Joe Stiglitz: Today's Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics
Wednesday, October 10, 2001
by Greg Palast
The World Bank's former Chief Economist's accusations are eye-popping - including how the IMF and US Treasury fixed the Russian elections
"It has condemned people to death," the former apparatchik told me. This was like a scene out of Le Carre. The brilliant old agent comes in from the cold, crosses to our side, and in hours of debriefing, empties his memory of horrors committed in the name of a political ideology he now realizes has gone rotten.
And here before me was a far bigger catch than some used Cold War spy. Joseph Stiglitz was Chief Economist of the World Bank. To a great extent, the new world economic order was his theory come to life.
I "debriefed" Stigltiz over several days, at Cambridge University, in a London hotel and finally in Washington in April 2001 during the big confab of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. But instead of chairing the meetings of ministers and central bankers, Stiglitz was kept exiled safely behind the blue police cordons, the same as the nuns carrying a large wooden cross, the Bolivian union leaders, the parents of AIDS victims and the other 'anti-globalization' protesters. The ultimate insider was now on the outside.
In 1999 the World Bank fired Stiglitz. He was not allowed quiet retirement; US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, I'm told, demanded a public excommunication for Stiglitz' having expressed his first mild dissent from globalization World Bank style.
Here in Washington we completed the last of several hours of exclusive interviews for The Observer and BBC TV's Newsnight about the real, often hidden, workings of the IMF, World Bank, and the bank's 51% owner, the US Treasury.
And here, from sources unnamable (not Stiglitz), we obtained a cache of documents marked, "confidential," "restricted," and "not otherwise (to be) disclosed without World Bank authorization."
Stiglitz helped translate one from bureaucratise, a "Country Assistance Strategy." There's an Assistance Strategy for every poorer nation, designed, says the World Bank, after careful in-country investigation. But according to insider Stiglitz, the Bank's staff 'investigation' consists of close inspection of a nation's 5-star hotels. It concludes with the Bank staff meeting some begging, busted finance minister who is handed a 'restructuring agreement' pre-drafted for his 'voluntary' signature (I have a selection of these).
Each nation's economy is individually analyzed, then, says Stiglitz, the Bank hands every minister the same exact four-step program.
Step One is Privatization - which Stiglitz said could more accurately be called, 'Briberization.' Rather than object to the sell-offs of state industries, he said national leaders - using the World Bank's demands to silence local critics - happily flogged their electricity and water companies. "You could see their eyes widen" at the prospect of 10% commissions paid to Swiss bank accounts for simply shaving a few billion off the sale price of national assets.
And the US government knew it, charges Stiglitz, at least in the case of the biggest 'briberization' of all, the 1995 Russian sell-off. "The US Treasury view was this was great as we wanted Yeltsin re-elected. We don't care if it's a corrupt election. We want the money to go to Yeltzin" via kick-backs for his campaign.
CONTINUED...
http://www.gregpalast.com/the-globalizer-who-came-in-from-the-cold/
Others who have addressed YES include leading United States politicians and business people, especially those in the extraction industries cough Condoleeza Chevron.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ironically, in a piece called "Losing Credibility", the piece loses its own credibility....
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#3
If you define "integrity" as someone who blatantly lies in the face of truth, sure.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#27
I'm saying the OPPOSITE. I'm saying that video evidence AND audio evidence of the coup
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#34
You are smart enough to realize that not all regime changes are "coups", correct?
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#35
Yanukovich was driven from his position as elected president of Ukraine by months of
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#37
Regardless of your personal charactarization of the Maidan protests, Yanukovych was not removed....
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#38
No where near as "fast and loose" as the installation of the Bush/Cheney regime and the blowback
bobthedrummer
Sep 2014
#50
Seriously, how many more sources, and there are now literally thousands across the globe
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#6
I know, but here on DU, it's hard to believe there is a single person who needs an 'assessment'
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#9
Excellent article, thank you. This was all about the IMF V Ukraine being independent of the
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#7
Larry Summers to address Yalta European Strategy (YES) conference, being held in Kiev this year...
Octafish
Sep 2014
#18
The force behind the creation of the IMF and World Bank - FDR. Who wants out of both -
pampango
Sep 2014
#14
The IMF and World Bank long ago strayed from anything they were intended for originally.
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#39
Then who loans money to countries that need it? Rich countries, rich corporations, rich
pampango
Sep 2014
#41
Take Ukraine. The government had a choice, take the IMF loans which have MAJOR strings
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#45
Perhaps Yanukovich made a wise choice but he was reversing a campaign pledge. People cared.
pampango
Sep 2014
#47
Ukraine prefers to face repossession by the west than repossession by russia
mathematic
Sep 2014
#16
Me too, which is why I would avoid any loans from the IMF, where that is their very goal, to
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#40