Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
53. "ISIS has spent most of the past 18 months avoiding actually fighting the Syrian government,
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:18 AM
Sep 2014
concentrating instead on destroying its rivals, the Jabhat al-Nusra (Succor Front), other radical groups, and the more secular-minded Free Syrian Army."

When IS comes after its rivals among the rebels, it is vicious, mowing them down without conscience. Even classic al-Qaeda under Ayman al-Zawahiri has condemned IS and kicked it out of al-Qaeda.

Abu al-Miqdad of the Islamic Front, which has fought both the regime and IS, said he supported the American intervention against IS because of the latter’s bloodthirstiness. “They don’t distinguish between civilians and combatants and they kill people with knives,” he said. “Who kills people with knives?” He said he hoped the US bombed every last one of them to smithereens. “They are not Muslims,” he said, “but infidels.” He said that real Muslims would never have done what they did to civilians and to the Free Syrian Army.

Jaber, head of the Islamic Front’s ad hoc military police in Aleppo, agreed that the US air strikes would be welcome. He said that fighters were facing a de facto alliance of the regime of Bashar al-Assad with IS, since the two avoided fighting each other and concentrated on the other rebels.

Meanwhile, the UN has issued a report condemning both the Baath and IS/ ISIL for war crimes.

http://www.juancole.com/2014/08/welcome-strikes-terrorists.html

Syria jets hit Islamic State targets in Raqqa

Regime planes bombard Islamic State positions as fighters close in on Tabqa air base in northern Raqqa province. Activists say Syrian jets have bombarded positions of the Islamic State group in the northern province of Raqqa as the self-declared jihadists close in on the last army base in the region.

Government forces have previously held off from targeting the Islamic State group, formerly known as ISIL - a strategy that has aided the group's battle against other rebels such as the Islamic Front coalition, the Free Syrian Army and al-Qaeda's affiliate in the Syrian war, the Nusra Front.

Syria's president, Bashar al-Assad, has long painted the uprising in Syria as a foreign-backed conspiracy and his enemies say he has allowed the Islamic State to grow to promote that idea.

The attacks come after the Islamic State group on Thursday captured the headquarters of Syria's 17th Division, based in the Raqqa area. It posted a video online of its operation.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2014/08/syria-islamic-state-raqqa-201481812135189335.html

You provided on link for this June 24, 2014 attack. If it happened it appears to have been a lone exception to the rule.
RT. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #1
Ad Hominem attack FAIL. grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #3
Is this "ad hominem" as well? Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #18
Thank goodness there's still some honest folks in this debate, unlike the online propagandists. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #21
It's nice to see they present opposing views;) grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #22
Yeah. Let's go with that. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #23
personally I try to treat EVERY news source with a critical eye that looks for the holes KurtNYC Sep 2014 #24
TYT/Buzzfeed: "Russia's Online Troll Army Is Huge, Hilarious & Already Everywhere " Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #26
Same thing the NSA does here... grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #28
Yup. Exactly the same! Only Different. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #30
You would know;) grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #31
Hehe... SidDithers Sep 2014 #29
We know "Russian Online Troll Army is huge"! Always popping up with their distractions.. Cha Sep 2014 #35
The Op isn't even about President Putin . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #36
OMFG! William769 Sep 2014 #37
Like I said . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #40
Go for it! William769 Sep 2014 #41
When you are doing such a good job of proving my point? another_liberal Sep 2014 #43
LOL.. the OP is about RT. End of story. P.S. I'm not reading any RT Shite. Cha Sep 2014 #44
Didn't bother to read any of it, right? another_liberal Sep 2014 #45
"You are disrupting the flow of the conversation here with your off-topic........" Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #47
Good job! William769 Sep 2014 #39
Glad you saw this, William.. I got it from my Journal and had thanked Cha Sep 2014 #42
Lets try to stick to the topic of the OP, alright? another_liberal Sep 2014 #38
But there's an "army of Putin trolls" who've swooped down on us from the Kremlin. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #46
Write your own OP on that topic then . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #50
Your Opinions Are The Topic, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #54
Who better to tell us what Lavrov is saying? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2014 #11
Russia can stop all of this jamzrockz Sep 2014 #2
We can stop all of this by arming working with Assad, Iran, Israel, SA, Turkey, et al., to help THEM grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #5
Why even do anything? jamzrockz Sep 2014 #7
I have to agree. It seems to me ISIS may be the perfect thing to bring these disparate entities grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #9
Would the United States, Turkey, Israel or other Mid-East powers be willing . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #8
If you have been watching jamzrockz Sep 2014 #12
I've had seen no reason to take offense . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #15
There's a real question about what happens if Assad asks Russia for help. Xithras Sep 2014 #17
It would be advisable to avoid bombing in Syria . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #19
the pretext would probably not be the air strikes but the presence of ISIS itself KurtNYC Sep 2014 #4
Good point . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #10
The government in Iraq wants to attack ISIS. In Syria the government did not attack ISIS pampango Sep 2014 #16
June 24, 2014 - the Syrian Airforce struck ISIS in Iraq KurtNYC Sep 2014 #51
"ISIS has spent most of the past 18 months avoiding actually fighting the Syrian government, pampango Sep 2014 #53
Links KurtNYC Sep 2014 #56
All your links reference Syrian airstrikes on ISIS - oddly - in western Iraq, not in Syria. pampango Sep 2014 #58
Yes, of course, this has been the neocon plan since day 1: grahamhgreen Sep 2014 #6
Obama's speech will be one year to the day of his speech requesting authroization to bomb Assad. morningfog Sep 2014 #13
I had never seen that video clip before . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #14
a few years later and this is what he has to say nationalize the fed Sep 2014 #48
It would appear the Military/Industrial Complex guys got to the good General meantime . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #49
Don't rule that out malaise Sep 2014 #20
Is a rehabilitated Dick Cheney the kind of thing we should expect now? another_liberal Sep 2014 #33
I can't take any more of this madness malaise Sep 2014 #34
RT. LOL...nt SidDithers Sep 2014 #25
Not to split hairs but OPs subject could confuse some. Anansi1171 Sep 2014 #27
A series of air strikes is often referred to as an air assault . . . another_liberal Sep 2014 #32
Lavrov's CT's about bombing Syria are just that Obama isn't going to do it. davidpdx Sep 2014 #52
The Only Way Assad's Forces Would Come Under Fire, Sir, Is If They Tried To Interfere The Magistrate Sep 2014 #55
The best-laid schemes o' mice an' men Gang aft agley Robert Burns Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will air assault against ...»Reply #53