General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Greenwald: Americans overwhelmingly support military action against ISIS [View all]WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Almost two-thirds back attacking militants. Public in more hawkish mood, blares the Wall Street Journal about a new poll it released this morning. One prominent WSJ writer tweets: ISIS may have thought video beheadings would reduce Americans desire to act; it seems the opposite happened.
The poll itself does contain some grounds for these conclusions, finding that 61 percent say military action against ISIS in Iraq and Syria is in the national interest.
But half-baked suggestions that Americans want generic action risk being misleading. What actions do Americans actually support? It turns out the WSJ poll also finds that 40 percent say action should be limited to air strikes only and another 15 percent say we shouldnt act at all a total of 55 percent. Meanwhile, all of 34 percent support air strikes and sending in combat troops perhaps higher than one might expect, but still only one in three Americans.
Whats more, the poll also finds that only 27 percent say the U.S. should become more active in world affairs. Thats up from April, but still, it represents barely more than one in four Americans. Meanwhile, 40 percent say we should be less active and another 29 percent say we should maintain our current level of activeness a total of 69 percent.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2014/09/10/morning-plum-is-media-putting-thumb-on-scale-for-war/?hpid=z2