Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The IMF’s New Cold War Loan to Ukraine [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)28. No. Integrity means he pegged the banksters from Day 1.
The Big Bank Job
The Insanity of the $700 Billion Giveaway
by MICHAEL HUDSON
CounterPunch Sept. Sept. 25, 2008
The banksters plan now is for icing on the cake to take Mr. Paulsons $700 billion and run. Its not a bailout of the financial system. Its as giveaway to insiders, to sell out all their bad bets. Companies across the board will get rid of their bad mortgages, and also their bad car loans, furniture time payments, credit-card loans, student loans all the debts that any competent actuary could have told them never could have been paid in the first place.
This is not what Treasury Secretary Paulson is acknowledging, and shame on him for it. Last Friday, Sept., he was joined by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke singing in unison an advertising jingle for Americas new kleptocracy that rings so false that Congress and the American public must hear the off-notes. Londons Financial Times, as well as a host of Europeans realize it. That is what has been driving the dollars exchange rate this week. It seems easier for foreigners to recognize the threat to turn American democracy into a rapacious kleptocracy.
This change always is sudden, arranged under emergency conditions. Those with a 12-year memory will see George Bush as playing the role of Boris Yeltsin in Russia in 1996, paying off his campaign contributors by giving them all the economic surplus that the government could expropriate in the notorious loans for shares plan applauded and supported by Clinton Treasury Secretary (and current Obama advisor) Robert Rubin. (The moral: do we have a Putin in our near future to lock in the anti-democratic coup?)
How ironic all this is! Back in the 1970s there was theorizing that the Russian and American economies were converging. The idea was that both were moving toward more centralized state control, state financing, state subsidy, and a military-industrial complex. Nobody expected the convergence to occur Yeltsin-style in government giveaways to insiders to create a new group of financial billionaires the seven bankers under Yeltsin in 1996, and Mr. Paulsons Crony Capitalist gang today.
Lets look at the euphemisms as an exercise in doublethink. Mr. Paulson defended his troubled asset relief program (TARP) by claiming that illiquid mortgage assets have lost value choking off the flow of credit that is so vitally important to our economy. The credit that is so vitally important has taken the form of bad loans. Contra Mr. Paulsons pretense, the problem is not that they are illiquid. If that were the problem, it would be merely temporary. The Federal Reserve banks are designed to provide liquidity on good collateral, of course.
SNIP...
These bad loans are toxic because they can only be sold at a loss if at all, because foreign investors no longer trust the U.S. investment bankers or money managers to be honest. That is the problem that Congress is not willing to come out and face. Many of these loans are outright fraudulent. And they are being sold by crooks. Crooks who work for banks. Crooks who use accounting fraud such as the fraud that led to the firing of Maurice Greenberg at A.I.G. and his counterparts at Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other companies engaging in Enron-type accounting.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/09/25/the-insanity-of-the-700-billion-giveaway/
Compare that to the records for integrity of Penny Pritzker or Lawrence Summers. Can you say, "Kleptocracy"?
The Insanity of the $700 Billion Giveaway
by MICHAEL HUDSON
CounterPunch Sept. Sept. 25, 2008
The banksters plan now is for icing on the cake to take Mr. Paulsons $700 billion and run. Its not a bailout of the financial system. Its as giveaway to insiders, to sell out all their bad bets. Companies across the board will get rid of their bad mortgages, and also their bad car loans, furniture time payments, credit-card loans, student loans all the debts that any competent actuary could have told them never could have been paid in the first place.
This is not what Treasury Secretary Paulson is acknowledging, and shame on him for it. Last Friday, Sept., he was joined by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke singing in unison an advertising jingle for Americas new kleptocracy that rings so false that Congress and the American public must hear the off-notes. Londons Financial Times, as well as a host of Europeans realize it. That is what has been driving the dollars exchange rate this week. It seems easier for foreigners to recognize the threat to turn American democracy into a rapacious kleptocracy.
This change always is sudden, arranged under emergency conditions. Those with a 12-year memory will see George Bush as playing the role of Boris Yeltsin in Russia in 1996, paying off his campaign contributors by giving them all the economic surplus that the government could expropriate in the notorious loans for shares plan applauded and supported by Clinton Treasury Secretary (and current Obama advisor) Robert Rubin. (The moral: do we have a Putin in our near future to lock in the anti-democratic coup?)
How ironic all this is! Back in the 1970s there was theorizing that the Russian and American economies were converging. The idea was that both were moving toward more centralized state control, state financing, state subsidy, and a military-industrial complex. Nobody expected the convergence to occur Yeltsin-style in government giveaways to insiders to create a new group of financial billionaires the seven bankers under Yeltsin in 1996, and Mr. Paulsons Crony Capitalist gang today.
Lets look at the euphemisms as an exercise in doublethink. Mr. Paulson defended his troubled asset relief program (TARP) by claiming that illiquid mortgage assets have lost value choking off the flow of credit that is so vitally important to our economy. The credit that is so vitally important has taken the form of bad loans. Contra Mr. Paulsons pretense, the problem is not that they are illiquid. If that were the problem, it would be merely temporary. The Federal Reserve banks are designed to provide liquidity on good collateral, of course.
SNIP...
These bad loans are toxic because they can only be sold at a loss if at all, because foreign investors no longer trust the U.S. investment bankers or money managers to be honest. That is the problem that Congress is not willing to come out and face. Many of these loans are outright fraudulent. And they are being sold by crooks. Crooks who work for banks. Crooks who use accounting fraud such as the fraud that led to the firing of Maurice Greenberg at A.I.G. and his counterparts at Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other companies engaging in Enron-type accounting.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/09/25/the-insanity-of-the-700-billion-giveaway/
Compare that to the records for integrity of Penny Pritzker or Lawrence Summers. Can you say, "Kleptocracy"?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ironically, in a piece called "Losing Credibility", the piece loses its own credibility....
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#3
If you define "integrity" as someone who blatantly lies in the face of truth, sure.
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#27
I'm saying the OPPOSITE. I'm saying that video evidence AND audio evidence of the coup
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#34
You are smart enough to realize that not all regime changes are "coups", correct?
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#35
Yanukovich was driven from his position as elected president of Ukraine by months of
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#37
Regardless of your personal charactarization of the Maidan protests, Yanukovych was not removed....
Tommy_Carcetti
Sep 2014
#38
No where near as "fast and loose" as the installation of the Bush/Cheney regime and the blowback
bobthedrummer
Sep 2014
#50
Seriously, how many more sources, and there are now literally thousands across the globe
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#6
I know, but here on DU, it's hard to believe there is a single person who needs an 'assessment'
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#9
Excellent article, thank you. This was all about the IMF V Ukraine being independent of the
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#7
Larry Summers to address Yalta European Strategy (YES) conference, being held in Kiev this year...
Octafish
Sep 2014
#18
The force behind the creation of the IMF and World Bank - FDR. Who wants out of both -
pampango
Sep 2014
#14
The IMF and World Bank long ago strayed from anything they were intended for originally.
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#39
Then who loans money to countries that need it? Rich countries, rich corporations, rich
pampango
Sep 2014
#41
Take Ukraine. The government had a choice, take the IMF loans which have MAJOR strings
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#45
Perhaps Yanukovich made a wise choice but he was reversing a campaign pledge. People cared.
pampango
Sep 2014
#47
Ukraine prefers to face repossession by the west than repossession by russia
mathematic
Sep 2014
#16
Me too, which is why I would avoid any loans from the IMF, where that is their very goal, to
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#40