Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
46. Ok, you are plain wrong
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 08:12 PM
Sep 2014

"It has also been proven that if you increase the money supply without increasing the supply of consumer goods you force prices up. "

Actually, no, that has never been proven. Not once. Why? It's a completely nonsensical statement. The issue is not the supply of goods and services, but the productive capacity of the economy. Sure, you would probably get a short-term rise in the price level due to a temporary shortage, but let's not pretend that an economy like the US, with its massive domestic productive capacity and global supply chains, would suffer more than a mild and temporary hardship.

The difference between inflation and a rise in the price level is subtle, but real. Expectations define inflation. When you argue that a one-off transfer payment to the citizenry will somehow create inflation, you sound like an Austrian. I don't mean to insult you, but it's a really ignorant argument to make. Did the Bush tax rebate back in 2001 create an inflationary cycle? No, it didn't. This suggestion is much the same, though it seems to be of larger scale.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bush did that. Printed checks with his name on them. louis-t Sep 2014 #1
Foreign Affairs says something around 2k should do it big_dog Sep 2014 #2
Bought a lot of votes lame54 Sep 2014 #4
Does inflation ring a bell? upaloopa Sep 2014 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Sep 2014 #5
That is what Republicans say about minimum wage. yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #6
Except the poster said nothing about the minimum wage. Kingofalldems Sep 2014 #7
It's got nothing to do with politics. upaloopa Sep 2014 #8
This is Econ 101 tkmorris Sep 2014 #10
That makes some serious and unwarranted assumptions Lefty Thinker Sep 2014 #11
I kept it simple just because it seemed like that is what upaloopa Sep 2014 #14
With That Background. . . ProfessorGAC Sep 2014 #53
We're suffering from stagflation... ljm2002 Sep 2014 #12
Because there is no worth to the money. upaloopa Sep 2014 #15
Theory only gets you so far... ljm2002 Sep 2014 #16
You know that they are called the 1% for a reason don't you? upaloopa Sep 2014 #17
au contraire... ljm2002 Sep 2014 #43
New rule: no mentioning Econ 101 until you take 301,302.... Taitertots Sep 2014 #20
I guess you can give a discussion on what you mean then upaloopa Sep 2014 #22
Inflation...? CEO pay up over 900% since '78.... Bigmack Sep 2014 #37
Remember Romney's 47%? Some of them live right here upaloopa Sep 2014 #38
Can we print enough to put in our own offshore accounts, too? nt valerief Sep 2014 #9
We gave some $16 trillion to the banks to "lend" to us magical thyme Sep 2014 #13
there are issues you are not aware of upaloopa Sep 2014 #24
I am aware that more dollars chasing fewer goods = inflation magical thyme Sep 2014 #25
There is a reason we are not doing what you say we should. upaloopa Sep 2014 #28
like the right? seriously?!? I explained why I don't think it won't cause inflation magical thyme Sep 2014 #29
You have nothing to support what you say. No evidence, history upaloopa Sep 2014 #39
Per Pew Research the 2008 crash cost $108K per household magical thyme Sep 2014 #40
and I hear crickets. No surprise, since my statements are supported by facts. magical thyme Sep 2014 #42
Thanks quaker bill Sep 2014 #49
Ok, you are plain wrong MFrohike Sep 2014 #46
Milton Friedman called, he said the 1970's want their pseudo economic theories back Taitertots Sep 2014 #31
IIRC, the Bush checks were denied to those with student loans. grasswire Sep 2014 #30
the article I read on giving the money directly to the bottom 80% said outright magical thyme Sep 2014 #35
I have a problem with "paying off student loans and purchasing a home"... Bigmack Sep 2014 #44
Since the money was stolen from us to begin with, I believe a substantial magical thyme Sep 2014 #56
Daddy, There really is a Money Tree in the Back Yard !! Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2014 #18
That service is only available to banksters. marmar Sep 2014 #19
The Right Wing wealthy need to stop this "we don't need you" attitude AZ Progressive Sep 2014 #21
It is an old problem BlindTiresias Sep 2014 #23
Will it get printed and mailed every day? If not, the govt should give ppl jobs. nt valerief Sep 2014 #26
What do think will happen when people spend the money? Taitertots Sep 2014 #32
For a day. nt valerief Sep 2014 #47
Why? Do they burn the money after it gets spent once? Taitertots Sep 2014 #52
It gets siphoned to the govt via taxes for WAR so the rich can get richer. valerief Sep 2014 #54
You think that would happen in one day Taitertots Sep 2014 #55
a presidential candidate needs to offer this to the electorate grasswire Sep 2014 #27
A one time check to people would do nothing to cure the problems facing the working class abelenkpe Sep 2014 #33
I would prefer a work program designed to rebuild America infrastructure. B Calm Sep 2014 #34
Two words: Bake Sale NightWatcher Sep 2014 #36
The old helicopter money drop Taitertots Sep 2014 #41
I posted about this above... Bigmack Sep 2014 #45
The 1980 measurement of inflation says its 8-10 percent. roamer65 Sep 2014 #48
I'd like enough to pay off 6 more years of student loans please. ileus Sep 2014 #50
Exactly that was the republican plan to solve the recession. DetlefK Sep 2014 #51
BINGO! B Calm Sep 2014 #57
Skim the scum off the top... hunter Sep 2014 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»To Fix The Economy, Let's...»Reply #46