Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
33. To Be Fair To Chamberlain, Sir
Wed Sep 10, 2014, 10:36 PM
Sep 2014

It must be recalled his policy of appeasement was meant to preserve the possibility of forming an alliance with Hitler, in which Hitler would do the heavy lifting in a war against the Soviet Union. He had offered tremendous economic incentives to Hitler for such an alliance, referred to in the English press when it was discovered as 'the biggest bribe in history'. His anti-Communism was the unthinking reflex of a class of businessmen which saw Hitler as a champion of Europe against Bolshevism, and held nothing could be too bad if it was also against Communism ( which they largely held to be a plot by Jews in any case ). Chamberlain was not a simple dupe and delusional pacifist sort; he was playing for something, however clumsily and inexpertly.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Anyone Who Does Not Think Putin Is Angling For The Baltic States, Sir, Is Not Paying Attention The Magistrate Sep 2014 #1
I hope you are wrong, but fear you are right. pampango Sep 2014 #2
There Really Is Something Reminiscent Of The Thirties In All This, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #3
Yes I am seeing it Duckhunter935 Sep 2014 #29
It Is The Blend I Find Interesting, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #30
and they have been Duckhunter935 Sep 2014 #31
It Is True, Sir, Conditions Were In Some Ways Peculiarly Favorable The Magistrate Sep 2014 #38
What it really boils down to: is the US willing to go to war with Russia? Hugabear Sep 2014 #7
Well, considering all those countries you listed are NATO members NuclearDem Sep 2014 #8
It always has a choice. former9thward Sep 2014 #9
If the US wants to avoid that, it would have to withdraw from NATO. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #10
Who is going to enforce it? former9thward Sep 2014 #11
If none of the NATO members would commit to a conflict with Russia NuclearDem Sep 2014 #13
Many, many treaties have been broken by nations over the years including the U.S. former9thward Sep 2014 #18
Alright, so just a big middle finger to the Baltics then. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #19
So you are willing to have 150 million American incinerated for Estonia. former9thward Sep 2014 #20
No. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #21
And how is this "intimidation" going to happen? former9thward Sep 2014 #22
We can start by not treating the Baltics as throwaway states but as allies. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #23
And your desire to go to war doesn't surprise me in the least. former9thward Sep 2014 #24
I'm interested in actually preventing one, thanks. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #26
Neville Chamberlain would be so proud of you. IronGate Sep 2014 #32
To Be Fair To Chamberlain, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #33
Interesting. IronGate Sep 2014 #34
I Recommend To You This Work, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #35
Just ordered it from Amazon. IronGate Sep 2014 #36
You Will Enjoy It, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #37
I will ask you what the other poster totally ignored. former9thward Sep 2014 #39
You damn well stand up to aggression, IronGate Sep 2014 #41
Not specific at all. former9thward Sep 2014 #42
Stand up to agression means just that, IronGate Sep 2014 #43
What specific action? former9thward Sep 2014 #44
Troop and equipment buildup, IronGate Sep 2014 #46
You not liking my answer is not the same as me ignoring the question. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #49
When can we expect you to stop putting up strawmen in your posts? former9thward Sep 2014 #51
Well, since you were fine with the Russians persecuting the Tatars NuclearDem Sep 2014 #52
Who is the "we" you keep referring to? former9thward Sep 2014 #53
Terrific dodge! NuclearDem Sep 2014 #55
I don't play the stawmen game. former9thward Sep 2014 #56
Russia and China fought border skirmishes for decades. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #47
That Goes Way Back, Sir The Magistrate Sep 2014 #48
as the joke goes sire, in 200 years it will be Ukraine and China having geek tragedy Sep 2014 #50
Not paying attention or are being Deliberately Obtuse. Cha Sep 2014 #14
Deliberately Obtuse, Ma'am, Or Actively In Support, Are Other Possibilities.... The Magistrate Sep 2014 #15
Yes, Thank you ,Sir! Cha Sep 2014 #16
Wow. Just...wow. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #4
I've seen pro-Russian posters on the net say this is a petty, dumb move by Russia muriel_volestrangler Sep 2014 #5
Troubling. nt conservaphobe Sep 2014 #6
“It [the Sudetenland] is the last territorial claim that I have to make in Europe.” hobbit709 Sep 2014 #12
When we said Putin wants to resurrect the Soviet empire we were dismissed as hyperbolic. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2014 #17
When Putin came for Crimea, concerns were brushed aside. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #27
Putin has lost his mind. karynnj Sep 2014 #25
Are there any other links for this? "Russia appears to" and "The Lithuanian Karmadillo Sep 2014 #28
Any breach of NATO borders means a massive war. MohRokTah Sep 2014 #40
The borders of the Baltics need a lot more troops and surveillance equipment. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #45
That's just bizarre. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2014 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Russia calls for Lithuani...»Reply #33