Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let me get this straight. US to bomb Syria to protects "its citizens" = OK, Russia sends troops [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)21. Lol, you mean lik Libya?? Checked that country lately? I remember being told the
same thing about Libya, how we were going there to 'fight terror'. Not much of a fight, other than against ordinary people. The terrorists are now out of control there. After we got control of the oil we lost interest in 'protecting civilians' and we don't even bother to look at what is happening there.
I KNOW we will be saying the same thing, those of us who predicted the outcome in Libya and Iraq and Afghanstan, about Syria in a very short time. And people such as yourself will suddenly be silent. As are the enthusiastic supporters of Air strikes in Libya. Of course we had our 'proxy army' there on the ground, as Hillary calls them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let me get this straight. US to bomb Syria to protects "its citizens" = OK, Russia sends troops [View all]
Purveyor
Sep 2014
OP
There was no Civil War in Syria or in Liby until we started supporting terrorists in those countries
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#18
Well, no. Your facts are wrong. Supporting uprisings that occur vs. inventing uprisings--
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#30
No, I'm afraid it is you who is wrong. A few protesters is not a rebellion, it is a few
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#34
We can't keep track of who's fighting in Syria, we very obviously do not and have not
TwilightGardener
Sep 2014
#38
The area of Syria that will be hit with air strikes is currently not under the control of Syria.
MohRokTah
Sep 2014
#5
actually neither party in Congress wants to do their job, and on the idiot talking head shows on
still_one
Sep 2014
#15
Lol, you mean lik Libya?? Checked that country lately? I remember being told the
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#21
Not at this very moment but the President set the stage. Oh that's right, a "strike" isn't
Purveyor
Sep 2014
#12
Are you calling me a neocon or a neolib, Purveyor? Do you know me well enough
ChisolmTrailDem
Sep 2014
#23
Whatevs, morningfog. But I wish you'd slow down and give me a chance to swallow all them
ChisolmTrailDem
Sep 2014
#32
"Then the threat to US interests and personnel will be from Assad" - and at that point,
ChisolmTrailDem
Sep 2014
#26