Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why the fuck is The Fed setting the stage to bankrupt local municipalities? [View all]Sgent
(5,858 posts)21. Regulators Open to Counting Muni Bonds in Bank Assets
http://online.wsj.com/articles/banking-regulators-open-to-including-municipal-bonds-in-bank-financing-rule-1410284586
WASHINGTONFederal banking regulators said they plan to revisit a decision to exclude municipal securities from a postcrisis rule aimed at ensuring banks have enough cash on hand to survive a crisis, saying they are open to allowing some debt issued by states and localities to count as a "safe" asset.
Top officials from three bank regulatorsthe Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.told Senate lawmakers Tuesday they would consider altering a rule completed last week that requires banks to hold enough cash or cash-like assets to fund their operations for 30 days. Previously, only the Fed had expressed a willingness to alter the rule.
Municipal securities currently don't count as a "high-quality liquid asset" under the rule, which means they won't qualify under the new funding requirements. State and local officials have said the exclusion could prompt banks to retreat from the municipal debt markets, forcing governments to scale back spending on roads, schools and other infrastructure projects financed with municipal bonds. Banks play an increasingly important role in the market, having nearly doubled their ownership of municipal securities over the past decade to more than 11%, according to Fed data.
<break>
It seems like muni's were excluded to to liquidity issues, not due to high quality or not. I don't know how real that issue is, and there maybe some bonds that are reasonably liquid and others which are not.
WASHINGTONFederal banking regulators said they plan to revisit a decision to exclude municipal securities from a postcrisis rule aimed at ensuring banks have enough cash on hand to survive a crisis, saying they are open to allowing some debt issued by states and localities to count as a "safe" asset.
Top officials from three bank regulatorsthe Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.told Senate lawmakers Tuesday they would consider altering a rule completed last week that requires banks to hold enough cash or cash-like assets to fund their operations for 30 days. Previously, only the Fed had expressed a willingness to alter the rule.
Municipal securities currently don't count as a "high-quality liquid asset" under the rule, which means they won't qualify under the new funding requirements. State and local officials have said the exclusion could prompt banks to retreat from the municipal debt markets, forcing governments to scale back spending on roads, schools and other infrastructure projects financed with municipal bonds. Banks play an increasingly important role in the market, having nearly doubled their ownership of municipal securities over the past decade to more than 11%, according to Fed data.
<break>
It seems like muni's were excluded to to liquidity issues, not due to high quality or not. I don't know how real that issue is, and there maybe some bonds that are reasonably liquid and others which are not.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why the fuck is The Fed setting the stage to bankrupt local municipalities? [View all]
99th_Monkey
Sep 2014
OP
Well, the article did suggest treasuries and corp bonds would still be options.
BadgerKid
Sep 2014
#12
I'm a total amatuer on economics but I want to know the answer to this one also. It and what we
jwirr
Sep 2014
#8
So corporate bonds are given precedence over State and Municipal Bonds, expect to see
Uncle Joe
Sep 2014
#14
How many Detroits do we have to have before we recognize something is wrong? nm
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#20
munis aren't necessarily considered safe anymore. Ask Detroit's bondholders.
geek tragedy
Sep 2014
#25
There is nothing I am more furious about right now than education. This will affect
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2014
#29