Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Space Opinions Survey [View all]bananas
(27,509 posts)19. Five years after Augustine: How does the panel feel about NASA’s Space Launch System?
http://blog.chron.com/sciguy/2014/06/five-years-after-augustine-how-does-the-panel-feel-about-nasas-space-launch-system/
Five years after Augustine: How does the panel feel about NASAs Space Launch System?
Posted on June 17, 2014 | By Eric Berger
<snip>
Augustine lamented the fact that NASA is still being asked to take on ambitious goals: build a big expensive rocket, space capsule and send humans to Mars in the 2030s, without having nearly enough resources to accomplish this.
<snip>
The aftermath of the Augustine commission, during which Congress ordered NASA to build the SLS, was unfortunate, Chiao said.
That was a big disappointment to most of us, probably all of us, on the committee. They did exactly what we asked them not to do, which was dont partially fund it, and say you want to do everything.
<snip>
Greason, in an interview, said NASA simply cant afford to both build the SLS and use it to fly meaningful missions.
The one thing that was clear that could not be done was to carry forward this approach with the existing budget, and thats exactly what theyre doing, he said.
<snip>
Five years after Augustine: How does the panel feel about NASAs Space Launch System?
Posted on June 17, 2014 | By Eric Berger
<snip>
Augustine lamented the fact that NASA is still being asked to take on ambitious goals: build a big expensive rocket, space capsule and send humans to Mars in the 2030s, without having nearly enough resources to accomplish this.
<snip>
The aftermath of the Augustine commission, during which Congress ordered NASA to build the SLS, was unfortunate, Chiao said.
That was a big disappointment to most of us, probably all of us, on the committee. They did exactly what we asked them not to do, which was dont partially fund it, and say you want to do everything.
<snip>
Greason, in an interview, said NASA simply cant afford to both build the SLS and use it to fly meaningful missions.
The one thing that was clear that could not be done was to carry forward this approach with the existing budget, and thats exactly what theyre doing, he said.
<snip>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Maybe you should pst these as polls? 1) all the money for war to go to NASA. Higher.
grahamhgreen
Sep 2014
#1
Right now, I believe we should drop every program but those that totally foster the well being of
Zorra
Sep 2014
#10
My friend, I don't see human survival as anything important in the current or future state of the
Zorra
Sep 2014
#12
Five years after Augustine: How does the panel feel about NASA’s Space Launch System?
bananas
Sep 2014
#19