Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brush

(61,033 posts)
56. Dem or repug president, we were going to do something about ISIS
Fri Sep 12, 2014, 10:43 AM
Sep 2014

This president's policy should be a surprise only for its restraint. And I say that realizing and acknowledging — unlike some who seem to overlook this or have yet to accept it — the President of the United States is head of the most rapacious, blood-stained, military-industrial-complex-dominated empire in the history of the world, i repeat, THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD, and the forces that wield power within it, even beyond the power of the president, will not be denied yet again a profit-making opportunity. Obama has denied them repeatedly.

Criticize his foreign policy all you want but he has shown remarkable restraint, and courage, in the face of those aforementioned forces, in keeping us out of war in Syria; he played his cards right and got rid of Kaddaffi without sending troops; he let the Egypt Arab Spring play out to get rid of Mubarak without troop intervention, and he openly stated we're not sending troops to the Ukraine.

He has constantly shown his anti-war bona fides and even with this ISIS crisis his reluctance to get into a war is obvious to those who take the time to look and access the situation instead of repeating the far right and/or far left talking points against whatever he does or does not do.

I said all that to say that the President of the United States, and all that that title entails, could hardly keep out of this ISIS crisis and survive. That's right, I said SURVIVE — and I'm not talking about impeachment.

If Barack Obama had went on national TV the other night and said we will do nothing in regard to the current ISIS crisis as it is a matter for Syria and Iraq to solve he would, IMO, be either assassinated or perish in an Air Force One crash or some other "accident" within 6 months.

The MIC and its bought-and-paid-for sycophants (repug and blue dog dem politicians and/or their agents in the field) would see to that. Empire and humongous, humongous profits not gained previously in Syria, Libya, Egypt and the Ukraine are at stake (that's really what it's all about — cries of liberty and justice and threats to the US notwithstanding), and no reluctant-to-go-to-war president will be allowed to stand in the way of yet another oligarchic, coffer-stuffing cash bonanza, especially a black president.

Matter a fact, better make that dead in 3 months instead of 6 because of the black factor.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I supported the Afghan War in 2001 bluestateguy Sep 2014 #1
I remember I was 13 when my brother went over to fight in the Gulf War. I had no idea of the liberal_at_heart Sep 2014 #2
As did the vast majority of Americans - at or around 87%, depending on the pollster. BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #33
Same here. Some on DU live in a fantasy world in which ... JoePhilly Sep 2014 #42
I did as well Man from Pickens Sep 2014 #60
Certainly you shouldn't even have to ask. If a repuke were facilitating such action Purveyor Sep 2014 #3
Yes, there would be near universal opposition and condemnation here but cali Sep 2014 #13
+ Eighty Gazillion Scuba Sep 2014 #22
For me... sendero Sep 2014 #32
Faith in EVERYTHING he does Doctor_J Sep 2014 #59
Dem or repug president, we were going to do something about ISIS brush Sep 2014 #56
Prior to Bush, we were maintaining no-fly zones in Iraq jberryhill Sep 2014 #4
Yea, but bombing never works!!!!!! JoePhilly Sep 2014 #48
I suspect not, but that doesn't mean that the people who'd be acting differently are wrong now Donald Ian Rankin Sep 2014 #5
Nor does it mean the reverse. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2014 #28
I'm sure Putin supporters would still be for his wars of aggression. joshcryer Sep 2014 #6
huh? I'm far from a Putin supporter, I don't support this new war cali Sep 2014 #15
I think it's OK to try something and fail, than to do nothing. joshcryer Sep 2014 #16
It's certainly OK to try some things that may well result in failure. It's NOT OK to start a war cali Sep 2014 #19
Logic fail of epic proportions. joshcryer Sep 2014 #21
Not a fail at all. Fact is, bombs are often our first and only option, and they always backfire. Scuba Sep 2014 #23
Yawn. joshcryer Sep 2014 #27
let's see: you call me heartless- and yes, that's precisely what you did- cali Sep 2014 #25
Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #29
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions." Demit Sep 2014 #49
So I guess this means you and Cali aren't going to be running mates in 2016? davidpdx Sep 2014 #57
Good job in your last graf! You knocked that strawman out cold. Demit Sep 2014 #38
Seriously, you're going with the it's better to do something argument? Savannahmann Sep 2014 #50
There are two types of hawks. Union Scribe Sep 2014 #7
I think the latter is worse Puzzledtraveller Sep 2014 #41
Nope FlatStanley Sep 2014 #8
NO n/t ReRe Sep 2014 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author woo me with science Sep 2014 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author woo me with science Sep 2014 #11
My opinion hasn't changed. Live and Learn Sep 2014 #12
but we'll get it right this time, because obama! KG Sep 2014 #14
I suspect there would. LiberalAndProud Sep 2014 #17
You are not alone malaise Sep 2014 #18
Well said. nt woo me with science Sep 2014 #44
You have cultural PTSD and you need to get over it. randome Sep 2014 #20
+ 1000. Thank you! BlueCaliDem Sep 2014 #31
We've heard them cry 'Wolf!' too often. randome Sep 2014 #43
Obama isn't Bush. This isn't 2003. NuclearDem Sep 2014 #24
just like with the heritage foundation healthcare scam Doctor_J Sep 2014 #26
Objective lies. joshcryer Sep 2014 #30
you are correct Puzzledtraveller Sep 2014 #40
Being always every time in every situation... sendero Sep 2014 #34
+1 treestar Sep 2014 #37
Of course there wouldn't. LWolf Sep 2014 #35
A Republican would be doing different things treestar Sep 2014 #36
Nope, easy as that. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2014 #39
Obama said he'd increase troops in Afganistan as a candidate ... JoePhilly Sep 2014 #45
Hey maybe that's cuz democrats trust democratic leaders. mathematic Sep 2014 #46
Do you think if a repuke prez had announced on the 9/11 anniv that we were launching more attacks NightWatcher Sep 2014 #47
the fact you think many of us find ANYTHING 'acceptable simply because we have a Dem in the WH" KittyWampus Sep 2014 #53
so you swallow the false equivalency bullshit? Pathetic. KittyWampus Sep 2014 #51
You mean like yesterday's "Not attacking IS would be just like letting Hitler loose in the 30's" Doctor_J Sep 2014 #58
Not all Democrats here are hypocrites as some seem to think. NYC Liberal Sep 2014 #52
Just when I thought we were out... tularetom Sep 2014 #54
No. 840high Sep 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I can't help but wonder w...»Reply #56