Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I stand with President Obama [View all]Maedhros
(10,007 posts)22. The "will of the people" can be manufactured - just ask Goering.
It's been clear for many years that the MSM acts as stenographer and mouthpiece for the White House in matters of foreign policy and national security. Whatever popular support exists for attacking ISIS was created by the media.
For example, the fear that ISIS "sleeper cells" are lurking in America:
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/09/08/lesson-americans-refuse-learn-war/
New York Times: The Obama administration is preparing to carry out a campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria that may take three years to complete, requiring a sustained effort that could last until after President Obama has left office, according to senior administration officials.
CNN: Americans are increasingly concerned that ISIS represents a direct terror threat, fearful that ISIS agents are living in the United States, according to a new CNN/ORC International poll. Most now support military action against the terrorist group.
CNN: Americans are increasingly concerned that ISIS represents a direct terror threat, fearful that ISIS agents are living in the United States, according to a new CNN/ORC International poll. Most now support military action against the terrorist group.
Greenwald says it best:
In case youre wondering how so many Americans have been led to embrace such fear-mongering tripe, consider the statement last week of Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida:
This is a terrorist group the likes of which we havent seen before, and we better stop them now. It ought to be pretty clear when they start cutting off the heads of journalists and say theyre going to fly the black flag of ISIS over the White House that ISIS is a clear and present danger.
Theyre a clear and present danger because they threatened to fly the black flag of ISIS over the White House. Its hard to believe the fear-mongering is anything but deliberate.
This is a terrorist group the likes of which we havent seen before, and we better stop them now. It ought to be pretty clear when they start cutting off the heads of journalists and say theyre going to fly the black flag of ISIS over the White House that ISIS is a clear and present danger.
Theyre a clear and present danger because they threatened to fly the black flag of ISIS over the White House. Its hard to believe the fear-mongering is anything but deliberate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am ambivalent, watching and it doesn't matter what I declare on a forum as far as immediate policy
uppityperson
Sep 2014
#5
I'm not letting party allegiance cloud my judgement when it comes to protecting the interests
corkhead
Sep 2014
#8
There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. Lord Acton
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2014
#15
I do not support Presidents who manipulate the population into supporting a war of choice.[n/t]
Maedhros
Sep 2014
#18
Actually, in this instance the causation goes in the other direction
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2014
#19
Obviously, I strongly oppose his plans re ISIS, but that said I have a great deal of sympathy
cali
Sep 2014
#25
not me. Not only do I not support military action in Syria, I am pissed at what is
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2014
#34