Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: George W. Bush -- Hero! [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)27. Amy Goodman is TOPS!
The Free Press is why Democracy has a fighting chance...
Anatomy of a Rove Dirty Trick
by Mary
Sunday :: Sep 19, 2004
Karl Rove is the man behind George W Bush's Presidency. According to William Slater, co-author of Bush's Brain, Rove realized back in 1990 that he could make Bush President, first by getting him elected governor. And so he has. Karl Rove would make his mentor, Lee Atwater, proud. Figuring out how to destroy your enemy while neutralizing his charge without leaving any traces is a Rove speciality. Yet, as all good detectives know, sometimes you find the criminal by matching the MO (modus operandi) of the crime.
Rove's MO is all over the Killian memo controversy that threatens to take down Dan Rather.
During Bush's first run against Ann Richards, Rove knew that he needed to immunize Bush against the charge of being too aggressive and unfair when going after Ann Richards. So what he did was to create an ad where Bush declared, "My opponent attacked me personally." But get this, the ad was made and distributed to TV stations around Texas before any such accusation was made. Then the campaign used numerous taunts, including a whispering campaign that asserted Ann Richards was gay or too gay friendly to encourage her to pop off against Bush. As soon as she did, the previously prepared ad was shown all over Texas and Bush was seen as the innocent victim of an unfair attack by his opponent.
Then in the 2000 election, Rove was behind the destruction of J.H. Hatfield, the author of the book, Fortunate Son, which reported about Bush's use of cocaine when he was younger. As Mike Burke reports, the method was to provide damaging information about Bush's past to someone who could be then discredited.
In 1999, St. Martin's Press published a critical biography of Bush titled "Fortunate Son". The book quoted an unnamed "high-ranking advisor to Bush," who revealed Bush's 1972 drug bust. The source told author J.H. Hatfield, Bush "was ordered by a Texas judge to perform community service in exchange for expunging his record showing illicit drug use."
Hatfield later revealed that his source was none other than Karl Rove. That might seem ridiculous, considering Rove's lifelong loyalty to the Bushes and the fact that he now has an office adjacent to Bush's in the White House. But leaking the story to Hatfield essentially discredited the story and sent it into the annals of conspiracy theory. Soon after the book was published and just as St. Martin's was preparing a high profile launching of the book, the "Dallas Morning News" ran a story revealing that Hatfield was a felon who had served time in jail. In response, St. Martin's pulled the book.
"When the media stumbled upon a story regarding George W. Bush's 1972 cocaine possession arrest, Rove had to find a way to kill the story. He did so by destroying the messenger," says Sander Hicks, the former publisher of Soft Skull, which re-published "Fortunate Son." "They knew the stories of Dubya's cocaine and drink busts would come out, so they made certain that it would come out of the mouth of a guy they could smear," said journalist Greg Palast, who wrote the forward to the final edition of the book.
If Rove was Hatfield's source, he certainly wasn't trying to expose Bush's drug use. Instead he was trying to discredit and ultimately kill the story. And it worked. Few reporters since have dared to touch the story.
So let's look at the latest controversy surrounding Dan Rather. Rather has been a thorn in Bush's side for a long time. Remember, it was Dan Rather who was provided the initial Abu Ghraib photos back in April. Even though they got the documents first, CBS Sixty Minutes II held off for two weeks because of a request from the Pentagon. After Seymour Hersh was given the photos and the Taguba report, his decision to report this story pushed CBS to report on it two days before the New Yorker published the Hersh story. Rather, the reporter that broke this story on TV was now a legitimate target in Rove's war to destroy any who hurt his man. If he succeeds in bringing down Rather, think of the object lesson for other powerful mainstream journalists of what could happen if they were to try to betray Bush.
CONTINUED...
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/002695.php
...because that is how the People learn.
PS: You are most welcome, ReRe!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
bush* knew something was going to happen, just not when, and probably not exactly the what.
Raster
Sep 2014
#12
Before I retired I was in a carpool with some Rethugs and mentioned some of these details to them.
kairos12
Sep 2014
#43
what if you SHOWED them a copy of the August 6 memo "Bin Laden determined to strike in US"
napkinz
Sep 2014
#53
little-by-little and document release by document release the TRUTH will eventually come out...
Raster
Sep 2014
#81
Cheney may well have planned to use a terrorist attack, which they had been warned about . . .
another_liberal
Sep 2014
#14
have you heard the latest? talk of Condi Rice replacing Roger Goodell as NFL commissioner
napkinz
Sep 2014
#39
We should not be carrying forth his policies in Iraq. We should be prosecuting him.
grahamhgreen
Sep 2014
#36
If I recall, he spent most of August 2001 vacation clearing brush and figuring out
kairos12
Sep 2014
#42
TPTB will not allow a Republican to be required to account, no matter: how inept or illegal,
indepat
Sep 2014
#45
I wouldn't know what to call it, though... Since you're back, I'll post something...
freshwest
Sep 2014
#64
Was expecting flames, nice to see your reply. I think you'll be heartened by the OP.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#67
ignored August 6 memo, lied us into war against Iraq, tanked the economy ... and they paid no price
napkinz
Sep 2014
#56
Protected and ongoing: Obama DOJ Asks Court to Grant Immunity to George W. Bush For Iraq War
woo me with science
Sep 2014
#69