General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Anti-vax asshat RFK Jr. on Dr. Oz, promoting his anti-vax asshat book... [View all]chervilant
(8,267 posts)On Sat Sep 13, 2014, 02:10 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
How about a respectful dialogue about vaccines? ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5530459
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Anti-vaccination nonsense. People die because of this idiocy.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Sep 13, 2014, 02:22 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Wow. Not what I gleaned from that post AT ALL.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Frivolous alert.
The post in question violates no rules.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Why was this post alerted on? Any time I read an alerted post and this is the first question that comes to my mind, I know what my vote needs to be. This is one of those times. Vote to Leave.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A request for a reasoned discussion? This has NO PLACE on DU. Unless a post contains a personal insult, it must be by a disruptor.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: While I agree this is anti-vaccination nonsense, there is nothing in the posters misguided plea that is ban worthy.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really alerter? A plea to examine the evidence is nonsense? I am biased against anti-vac foolishness, but this isn't that.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.