Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

backscatter712

(26,357 posts)
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 01:42 PM Apr 2012

Those anti-wind-power rumors about wind turbines killing huge numbers of birds? BULLSHIT! [View all]

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/12/1082718/-British-Study-Wind-Turbines-are-NOT-Bird-Killers-Republicans-We-Hate-Wind-Power-

From The Guardian:

A large majority of birds can co-exist or thrive with operating windfarms, but some species are harmed during construction
A large majority of birds can co-exist or thrive with operating windfarms, but some species are harmed during construction
Share 67 reddit this
Severin Carrell, Scotland correspondent
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 12 April 2012 13.20 BST

A major new study has quashed fears that onshore windfarms are causing long-term damage to bird populations, but found new evidence that some species are harmed when windfarms are built.

The study by conservationists into the impacts on 10 of the key species of British upland bird, including several suffering serious population declines, concluded that a large majority of species can co-exist or thrive with windfarms once they are operating.


Even here on DU, people push those rumors. Now we know better!
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
read this from your own link nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #1
Nothing is completely harmless snooper2 Apr 2012 #2
read about the perils of dihydrous oxide ... zbdent Apr 2012 #6
Which may be rather harmful if LanternWaste Apr 2012 #13
or inhaled in large quantities ... zbdent Apr 2012 #15
bumper-stickers philosophies notwithstanding. LanternWaste Apr 2012 #16
What's the difference between the turbines on windfarms and the windmills that have been at work Ecumenist Apr 2012 #3
Concentration, we are having that issue in Jamul and Ocotillo right now nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #5
I know about San Onofre. I'm in the north State and have NEVER been happy with reactors in Ecumenist Apr 2012 #8
The other problem is construction, my editor has literally been chasing nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #10
Yeah, I agree with you. Here in the north, there is a "wind farm" @ the Altamont Pass. Ecumenist Apr 2012 #11
Same here, raptors are not having an easy time nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #12
What green technologies would you prefer? JDPriestly Apr 2012 #18
Distributive, as in solar in every roof, as first line nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #20
I agree about solar on every roof. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #21
I think the reason you don't read about it here is madokie Apr 2012 #7
I have no position in this argument, but I've seen a lot of wind turbines built and installed... JVS Apr 2012 #19
This seems to be correct - location, location, location jsmirman Apr 2012 #24
Birds can learn to avoid turbines. They can't learn to avoid acid rain. n/t Ian David Apr 2012 #4
There are turbines all over Spain WolverineDG Apr 2012 #9
spent a weekend at the Green Mountain Energy Wind Farm in Brazos, TX last year LanternWaste Apr 2012 #14
Wind farms are proliferating in southern Minnesota. Driving on I-90 on the way to Sioux Falls, MineralMan Apr 2012 #17
Electricity is more important than their life jenwilson Apr 2012 #22
Show your study to the golden eagles that are being killed. former9thward Apr 2012 #23
Here are the species that were studied: XemaSab Apr 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Those anti-wind-power rum...