General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Measles is back: A mother's story, from today's LA Times: [View all]LeftishBrit
(41,450 posts)You are right that most children, who get these diseases, even measles, do not die. But a certain number do die; and many others are very ill, and some of these suffer long-term ill-effects.
Why should people get these diseases, now that they're avoidable, just because earlier generations did? One could say the same about any number of things, including living in houses: the prehistoric cave-people did not live in houses, and yet enough of them survived to maintain the human race!
In 1948, when you were born according to your post, life expectancy was 10 years lower than nowadays. The change is even more marked with regard to infant mortality: about 1 in 25 children in 1948 died before their first birthday; nowadays it is more like 1 in 200. There are many other reasons for this change besides vaccines, but vaccines are one reason; and in any case it is not true that children survived just as well in the past as now.